(1) Where a private
conversation or a private activity has inadvertently or unexpectedly come to
the knowledge of a person as a direct or indirect result of the use of a
listening device or an optical surveillance device in accordance with a
warrant or an emergency authorisation issued under Part 4 —
(a)
evidence of the conversation or activity; and
(b)
evidence obtained as a consequence of the conversation or activity so coming
to the knowledge of that person,
may be given by that
person in any criminal proceeding even if the warrant or emergency
authorisation was not issued for the purpose of allowing that evidence to be
obtained.
(2) Subsection (1)
does not render any evidence admissible if the application upon which the
warrant or emergency authorisation was issued was not, in the opinion of the
court, made in good faith.