(1) New evidence
cannot be tendered to the WAIRC during a hearing of an appeal unless the WAIRC
grants leave under subsection (2) or (3).
(2) The WAIRC may
grant the chief executive officer leave to tender new evidence if —
(a) the
appellant consents; or
(b) it
is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to do so.
(3) The WAIRC may
grant the appellant leave to tender new evidence if —
(a) the
chief executive officer consents; or
(b) the
WAIRC is satisfied that —
(i)
the appellant is likely to be able to use the new
evidence to show that the chief executive officer has acted upon wrong or
mistaken information; or
(ii)
the new evidence might materially have affected the chief
executive officer’s removal decision; or
(iii)
it is in the interests of justice to do so.
(4) In the exercise of
its discretion under subsection (3), the WAIRC must have regard to —
(a)
whether or not the appellant was aware of the substance of the new evidence
before the appellant’s removal; and
(b)
whether or not the substance of the new evidence was contained in a document
to which the appellant had reasonable access before the appellant’s
removal.
[Section 11CJ inserted: No. 29 of 2014 s. 16.]