(1) In determining
whether the debarment of a supplier is in the public interest and the period
for which the supplier should be debarred, the Department CEO may consider all
or any of the following —
(a) the
seriousness of the conduct for which the supplier may be debarred;
(b) any
remedial measures taken by the supplier in respect of that conduct;
(c) any
mitigating circumstances relating to that conduct;
(d)
whether the supplier had effective standards of operation and internal control
systems in place at the time of that conduct and before any official
investigation of that conduct;
(e)
whether the supplier brought that conduct to the attention of the appropriate
government authority in a timely manner on becoming aware of it;
(f)
whether the supplier has fully investigated the circumstances in which that
conduct occurred and made the result of the investigation available to the
Department CEO;
(g)
whether the supplier cooperated fully with the appropriate government
authority during any official investigation of, or court or administrative
action in relation to, that conduct;
(h)
whether the supplier has paid or met all criminal, civil and administrative
penalties or liabilities for that conduct (including any investigative or
administrative costs incurred by government authorities in relation to that
conduct);
(i)
whether the supplier has made or agreed to make full
restitution for the consequences of that conduct;
(j)
whether the supplier has taken appropriate disciplinary action against the
individuals responsible for that conduct;
(k) any
criminal or other penalties that have been imposed on the supplier for that
conduct or on the individuals responsible for that conduct;
(l) any
current or previous decision to debar or suspend the supplier under these
regulations or under a corresponding debarment regime;
(m) any
other factor the Department CEO considers relevant.
(2) In the case of the
debarment of an affiliate of a debarred supplier, the Department CEO may
consider all or any of the factors specified in subregulation (1) in
relation to the conduct for which the supplier was debarred and may in
addition consider the following —
(a) the
nature and extent of the connection or relationship between the debarred
supplier and the affiliate;
(b) the
extent of any suspected involvement of the affiliate in the conduct for which
the supplier was debarred (including the extent of the affiliate’s
knowledge or suspected knowledge of the conduct, or awareness or suspected
awareness that the conduct was unlawful or wrong);
(c) any
other relevant matters arising since the debarment of the supplier.