(1) The impairment
review committee must investigate a complaint referred to it by the Board.
(2) On completion of
the investigation and after —
(a)
considering any report given to the committee under section 101(6); and
(b)
giving the medical practitioner an opportunity to make a written submission
to, or attend before and make a representation to, the committee; and
(c)
having regard to any submission or representation made by the medical
practitioner,
the impairment review
committee must submit a report in writing to the Board —
(d)
detailing its findings and conclusions in relation to the complaint referred
to it; and
(e)
making a recommendation to the Board under subsection (3); and
(f)
giving reasons for its recommendation.
(3) The committee may
make the following recommendations to the Board under
subsection (2)(e) —
(a) that
the Board take no further action in relation to the complaint;
(b) if
the medical practitioner consents to being suspended from the practice of
medicine for a period not exceeding 2 years specified by the impairment
review committee, that the Board suspend the medical practitioner from the
practice of medicine for a period recommended by the committee or specified by
the Board;
(c) if
the complaint involves a disciplinary matter, that the Board take action under
Division 5;
(d) if
the complaint involves a competency matter, that the Board take action under
Division 7;
(e) that
the Board requires the medical practitioner to give an undertaking to the
Board to undergo counselling specified by the impairment review committee;
(f) that
the Board impose conditions specified by the committee on the
medical practitioner’s registration;
(g) if
the subject matter of the complaint is sufficiently serious to warrant
suspension or cancellation of the medical practitioner’s registration,
that the Board make an allegation to the State Administrative Tribunal.
(4) The impairment
review committee may recommend that the Board do both of the things referred
to in subsection (3)(e) and (f).