![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Australian Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills - Scrutiny Digests |
Chapter 2
Commentary on ministerial responses
2.1 This chapter considers the responses of ministers to matters previously raised by the committee.
Purpose
|
This bill seeks to amend various Acts relating to agricultural and
veterinary chemicals to:
• provide the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines
Authority (APVMA) and industry with flexibility to deal with certain
types of
new information provided when the APVMA is considering an application;
• enable the use of new regulatory processes for chemicals of low
regulatory concern;
• provide for extensions to limitation periods and protection periods
as an incentive for chemical companies to register certain
new uses of chemical
products;
• simplify reporting requirements for annual returns;
• support computerised decision-making by the APVMA;
• provide for APVMA to manage errors in an application at the
preliminary assessment stage;
• enable APVMA to grant part of a variation application under section
27 of the Schedule to the Agricultural and Veterinary Code Act 1994
(Agvet Code);
• enable a person to apply to vary an approval or registration that
is suspended;
• establish civil pecuniary penalties for contraventions of
provisions in the Agvet Code and the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals
(Administration) Act 1992 (Administration Act);
• provide APVMA with more comprehensive grounds for suspending or
cancelling approvals or registrations;
• enable the use of new, simpler processes for assessments based on
risk;
• simplify the APVMA’s corporate reporting requirements;
• amend the mechanism for dealing with minor variations in the
constituents in a product;
• clarify what information must be included on a label;
• correct anomalies in the regulation-making powers for the labelling
criteria;
• amend the notification requirements in section 8E of the Agvet
Code and amend section 7A of the Administration Act to clarify
the
authority to make an APVMA legislative instrument for residues of chemical
products in protected commodities;
• amend the definition of expiry date in the Agvet Code; and
• establish a governance Board for the APVMA and cease the existing
APVMA Advisory Board
|
Portfolio
|
Agriculture
|
Introduced
|
House of Representatives on 18 September 2019
|
Bill status
|
Before House of Representatives
|
2.2 In Scrutiny Digest 8 of 2019 the committee requested the minister's further advice as to whether the minister proposes to bring forward amendments to the bill to:
• limit the types of decisions that can be made by computers; and/or
• provide that the APVMA must, before determining that a type of decision can be made by computers, be satisfied by reference to general principles articulated in the legislation that it is appropriate for the type of decision to be made by a computer rather than a person.[2]
Minister's response[3]
2.3 The minister advised:
The Liberal and Nationals Government agrees to incorporate the information in the explanatory material and intends to amend the Bill to prescribe additional safeguards to help ensure that decisions made by computers will be consistent with relevant laws.
Committee comment
2.4 The committee thanks the minister for this response. The committee notes the minister's advice that the key information will be incorporated into the explanatory memorandum and that the government intends to amend the bill to prescribe additional safeguards to help ensure that decisions made by computers will be consistent with relevant laws.
2.5 The committee welcomes the minister's advice that the government intends to amend the bill to prescribe additional safeguards to ensure that decisions made by computers will be consistent with relevant laws.
2.6 In light of the minister's undertaking to amend the bill, the committee makes no further comment on this matter.
[1] Schedule 1, item 36, proposed section 5F. The committee draws senators’ attention to this provision pursuant to Senate Standing Orders 24(1)(a)(ii) and (iii).
[2] Senate Scrutiny of Bills Committee, Scrutiny Digest 8 of 2019, pp. 37–42.
[3] The minister responded to the committee's comments in a letter dated 28 November 2019. A copy of the letter is available on the committee's website: see correspondence relating to Scrutiny Digest 10 of 2019 available at: www.aph.gov.au/senate_scrutiny_digest
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AUSStaCSBSD/2019/169.html