AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Australia Transcripts

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia Transcripts >> 2005 >> [2005] HCATrans 200

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Documents | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

SZBXA v MIMIA [2005] HCATrans 200 (8 April 2005)

--

SZBXA v MIMIA [2005] HCATrans 200 (8 April 2005)

Last Updated: 20 April 2005

[2005] HCATrans 200


IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Office of the Registry
Sydney No S179 of 2004

B e t w e e n -

SZBXA

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders


GUMMOW J
KIRBY J


TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON FRIDAY, 8 APRIL 2005, AT 9.28 AM


Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GUMMOW J: The applicant is a citizen of Bangladesh whose application for a protection visa was refused by a delegate of the Minister on 9 November 1999. On 5 February 2002 the Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed that decision.

On 1 March 2002, the applicant instituted proceedings in the Federal Court seeking relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). After various adverse decisions in the Federal Court the applicant sought special leave to appeal to this Court. That application, Matter No S445 of 2003, was discontinued by the applicant on 14 November 2003, four days before the application was to be heard.

One day prior to that, on 13 November 2003, the applicant had instituted a proceeding in the Federal Magistrates Court identical to that instituted in the Federal Court on 1 March 2002. This second application was dismissed by the Federal Magistrates Court as vexatious and an abuse of process. An appeal to the Federal Court was dismissed by a judge of that Court (Hill J) on the further ground that the application made on 13 November 2003 was made well outside the 28-day period given in s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Therefore, the Court held, the Federal Magistrates Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the application. It is from this decision that the applicant now seeks special leave.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Federal Court. Accordingly special leave is refused with costs.

Pursuant to r 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing with costs this application for special leave.

I publish the disposition signed by Justice Kirby and myself.

AT 9.29 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCATrans/2005/200.html