SZAUZ v MIMIA [2005] HCATrans 250 (27 April 2005)

--

SZAUZ v MIMIA [2005] HCATrans 250 (27 April 2005)

Last Updated: 2 May 2005

[2005] HCATrans 250

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
Sydney No S496 of 2004

B e t w e e n -

SZAUZ

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 27 APRIL 2005, AT 9.22 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GLEESON CJ: The applicant is a citizen of Bangladesh who claims refugee status.

The Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicant a protection visa. Despite being invited to attend an oral hearing before the Tribunal, and accepting the invitation, the applicant did not attend. In its reasons the Tribunal indicated that it did not believe the claims made by the applicant. It concluded that the applicant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution because of political activity.

Pursuant to section 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) the applicant sought review of the Tribunal’s decision by the Federal Magistrates Court. That court dismissed that application. It held that no jurisdictional error in the decision of the Tribunal had been shown. An appeal to the Federal Court (Sackville J) was dismissed as having no merit whatsoever. In particular, Sackville J held there had been no denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal.

We have considered the applicant’s written submissions and the decisions of the Tribunal and the Courts below and we are of the view that there are insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly special leave to appeal is refused.

Pursuant to rule 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing this application for special leave.

AT 9.23 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED