SZEFW & Ors v MIMIA [2006] HCATrans 31 (9 February 2006)

--

SZEFW & Ors v MIMIA [2006] HCATrans 31 (9 February 2006)

Last Updated: 20 February 2006

[2006] HCATrans 031

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
Sydney No S486 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

SZEFW

First Applicant

SZEFX

Second Applicant

SZWFY

Third Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 9 FEBRUARY 2006, AT 9.22 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

HAYNE J: The applicants, husband, wife and their son, seek special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Allsop J) exercising the appellate jurisdiction of that Court. By those orders, Allsop J dismissed an appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing the applicants’ application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) in respect of the affirmation, by the Refugee Review Tribunal, of the decision of a delegate of the Minister refusing the applicants protection visas.

Because the applicants are unrepresented, their application for special leave falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of Allsop J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.23 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED