Shumack v Australian Federal Police Commissioner [2006] HCATrans 598 (9 November 2006)

--

Shumack v Australian Federal Police Commissioner [2006] HCATrans 598 (9 November 2006)

Last Updated: 13 November 2006

[2006] HCATrans 598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Registry No C6 of 2006

B e t w e e n -

PETER JAMES SHUMACK

Applicant

and

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE COMMISSIONER

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 9 NOVEMBER 2006, AT 9.18 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HAYNE J: The applicant seeks special leave to appeal against the orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Bennett J). By those orders, Bennett J dismissed the applicant’s application for leave to appeal against the orders of Gyles J that the applicant’s proceedings be dismissed and that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs.

Because the applicant is unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

The applicant’s written submissions raise no questions of law that would warrant a grant of special leave to appeal to this Court. We see no reason to doubt the correctness of the decisions of Bennett J or of Gyles J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.18 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED