SZHFC v MIMA & Anor [2007] HCATrans 451 (29 August 2007)

Last Updated: 4 September 2007

[2007] HCATrans 451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
Sydney No S395 of 2006

B e t w e e n -

SZHFC

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 29 AUGUST 2007, AT 9.22 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia
HAYNE J: The applicant, a citizen of India, seeks special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Allsop J) made in the exercise of the appellate jurisdiction of that Court. By those orders, Allsop J dismissed the applicant's appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court (Nicholls FM). The Federal Magistrates Court dismissed the applicant's claim for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) (and associated relief) directed to the Refugee Review Tribunal. The Tribunal affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the applicant a protection visa.

Because the applicant is unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of Allsop J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

I publish that disposition.

AT 9.23 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED