SZCBQ v MIMA & Anor [2007] HCATrans 454 (29 August 2007)

Last Updated: 4 September 2007

[2007] HCATrans 454

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
Sydney No S404 of 2006

B e t w e e n -

SZCBQ

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 29 AUGUST 2007, AT 9.26 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HAYNE J: The applicant is a citizen of India. He seeks special leave to appeal against orders made by a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Bennett J) made in the exercise of the appellate jurisdiction of that Court. By those orders, Bennett J dismissed the applicant's appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court (Lloyd-Jones FM). The Federal Magistrate dismissed the applicant's claim for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) (and associated relief) in respect of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming the refusal by a delegate of the Minister to grant the applicant a protection visa.

Because the applicant is unrepresented, the application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

The application for special leave follows a template which develops no arguable ground of appeal related to the facts and circumstances of the applicant's case. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of Bennett J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

I publish that disposition.

AT 9.27 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED