Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Australian Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation - Monitor |
Chapter 2
Concluded matters
This chapter lists matters previously raised by the committee and considered at its meeting on 26 March 2014. The committee has concluded its interest in these matters on the basis of responses received from ministers or relevant instrument-makers.
Correspondence relating to these matters is included at Appendix 3.
Purpose
|
Revokes and remakes the Commonwealth Scholarships Guidelines (Education) to
ensure that the efficiency dividend to university funding
included in the
2013-14 budget can be implemented; and separates Indigenous Commonwealth
Scholarships from other Commonwealth Scholarships
|
Last day to
disallow[1]
|
27 March 2014
|
Authorising legislation
|
|
Department
|
Education
|
Issue:
No information provided regarding consultation
Section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 directs a rule-maker to be satisfied that appropriate consultation, as is reasonably practicable, has been undertaken in relation to a proposed instrument, particularly where that instrument is likely to have an effect on business. Section 18, however, provides that in some circumstances such consultation may be unnecessary or inappropriate. The ES which must accompany an instrument is required to describe the nature of any consultation that has been carried out or, if there has been no consultation, to explain why none was undertaken (section 26). With reference to these requirements, the ES for the instrument does not explicitly address the issue of consultation (although the ES contains the heading, 'Consultation') [the committee requested further information from the minister; and requested that the ES be updated in accordance with the requirements of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003].
MINISTER'S RESPONSE:
The Minister for Education advised that, as the guidelines were remade primarily to implement the efficiency dividend to university funding announced as part of the 2013-14 Budget, consultation was not considered necessary and was not undertaken.
The minister further advised that the ES had been amended to include the information provided.
COMMITTEE RESPONSE:
The committee thanks the minister for his response and has concluded its interest in the matter.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/cth/AUSStaCSDLM/2014/60.html