Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Australian Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation - Monitor |
Purpose
|
Amends the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection – Historic Sites
and Monuments) Proclamation 2007 to declare four additional
Antarctic Historic
Sites and Monuments (HSMs) following their adoption at the 36th Antarctic Treaty
Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in
2013, and to vary the description of seven
existing HSMs declared under the Principal Proclamation
|
Last day to disallow
|
26 March 2015
|
Authorising legislation
|
|
Department
|
Environment
|
Issue:
Insufficient information regarding consultation
Section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 directs a rule-maker to be satisfied that appropriate consultation, as is reasonably practicable, has been undertaken in relation to a proposed instrument, particularly where that instrument is likely to have an effect on business. Section 18, however, provides that in some circumstances such consultation may be unnecessary or inappropriate. The ES which must accompany an instrument is required to describe the nature of any consultation that has been carried out or, if there has been no consultation, to explain why none was undertaken (section 26). With reference to these requirements, the committee notes that the ES states:
Australia is an Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party under the Antarctic Treaty and the Proclamation seeks to give effect to measures agreed to by Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties under the Antarctic Treaty...
All relevant Treaty Parties, including Australia, unanimously approved the variation of the descriptions of the HSMs [Historic Sites and Monuments] under Measure 11 at the 35th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in 2012.
While the committee does not usually interpret section 26 as requiring a highly detailed description of consultation undertaken, its usual approach is to consider an overly bare or general description, such as in this case, as not being sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The committee's expectations in this regard are set out in the 'Guideline on consultation' in Appendix 2 of this report. Noting, however, that the instrument resulted from a treaty process, the committee therefore draws the matter to the minister's attention in this instance.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/cth/AUSStaCSDLM/2015/15.html