Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Australian Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation - Monitor |
Purpose
|
Operates to specify the Minister’s determination of at least the
minimum total combined number of Protection (Class XA) visas
and Refugee and
Humanitarian (Class XB) visas that the Minister must take all reasonable
practicable measures to ensure are granted
for, the financial years commencing
2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018
|
Last day to disallow
|
26 March 2015
|
Authorising legislation
|
|
Department
|
Immigration and Border Protection
|
Issue:
Insufficient information regarding consultation
Section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 directs a rule-maker to be satisfied that appropriate consultation, as is reasonably practicable, has been undertaken in relation to a proposed instrument, particularly where that instrument is likely to have an effect on business. Section 18, however, provides that in some circumstances such consultation may be unnecessary or inappropriate. The ES which must accompany an instrument is required to describe the nature of any consultation that has been carried out or, if there has been no consultation, to explain why none was undertaken (section 26). With reference to these requirements, the committee notes the ES for the instrument states:
Under section 18(2)(b) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, consultation was considered inappropriate due to the Instrument being required as a matter of urgency.
The committee also notes the instrument will have a beneficial impact by:
...[raising] the minimum combined total number of Protection (Class XA) and Refugee and Humanitarian (Class XB) visas that the Minister must take all reasonably practicable measures to ensure are granted.
However, the increase commences in the financial year starting 1 July 2017. There is no change from the existing visa numbers for the financial years starting 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2016. It is not immediately apparent, therefore, why the instrument was required as a matter of urgency. The committee's expectations regarding why consultation has not been undertaken are set out in the 'Guideline on consultation' in Appendix 2 of this report. In particular, the committee would generally expect the ES to explain the reasoning as to why the instrument was considered urgent (as opposed to, for example, it being convenient or preferable not to undertake consultation). The committee therefore requests further information from the minister; and requests that the ES be updated in accordance with the requirements of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/cth/AUSStaCSDLM/2015/20.html