Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Australian Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation - Monitor |
National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – October 2017 reduction day) Determination 2017 (PB 44 of 2017) [F2017L00676] |
|
Purpose
|
Determines a weighted average disclosed price for certain brands of
pharmaceutical items with a data collection period ending 31 March
2017
|
Authorising legislation
|
|
Department
|
Health
|
Disallowance
|
15 sitting days after tabling (tabled Senate 20 June 2017)
Notice of motion to disallow currently must be given by
12 September 2017
|
Scrutiny principle
|
Standing Order 23(3)(a)
|
Consultation
Section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003 directs a rule-maker to be satisfied that appropriate consultation, as is reasonably practicable, has been undertaken in relation to a proposed instrument. The ES which must accompany an instrument is required to describe the nature of any consultation that has been carried out or,
if there has been no consultation, to explain why none was undertaken (paragraphs 15J(2)(d) and (e)).
With reference to these requirements, the committee notes that the ES for this instrument states:
This instrument affects certain pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS [pharmaceutical benefits scheme]. Pharmaceutical companies were consulted in relation to the introduction of price disclosure requirements during the policy development for introduction of price disclosure in 2007 during implementation phases, and during the development and implementation of the further PBS reforms of 2010, pricing changes in 2012, simplified price disclosure amendments in 2014 and measures announced in the 2015 PBS Access and Sustainability Package. Consultation occurred through meetings with peak industry bodies. Further information on price disclosure was also disseminated through peak industry bodies, during meetings with the Price Disclosure Working Group and directly to companies through information sessions conducted in March 2011, June 2012, and March 2016, and distribution of associated educational material at the time of amendments.
Pharmaceutical companies with a listed or delisted brand subject to the price disclosure requirements for the 2017 October Cycle disclosed information relevant to this determination directly to Australian Healthcare Associates Pty Ltd (AHA), known as the Price Disclosure Data Administrator (PDDA). AHA is prescribed in subregulation 85(6) as the person to whom, in accordance with paragraph 99ADC(1)(a), a responsible person is to provide price disclosure information. The PDDA provided responsible persons with an opportunity to check that the information disclosed to the PDDA was translated correctly to PDDA data files. This was done prior to that data being used to apply the method set out in the Regulations to arrive at the WADP [weighted average disclosed price] for listed brands.
While the committee does not usually interpret paragraphs 15J(2)(d) and (e) as requiring a highly detailed description of consultation undertaken, it considers that an overly bare or general description is insufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Legislation Act 2003. In this case, the ES primarily describes historical consultation that took place in relation to the introduction and implementation of price disclosure. The remainder of the consultation description discusses a process for disclosing data, and the provision of an opportunity for the supplier of a particular brand of a medicine on the PBS (the responsible person) to check that data has been translated correctly. In terms of complying with paragraphs 15J(2)(d) and (e) of the Legislation Act 2003, the committee's preferred approach would be for the ES to have explicitly stated that consultation for this determination was considered unnecessary (or inappropriate) for this reason.[1]
The committee's expectations in this regard are set out in the guideline on consultation published on the committee's website.[2]
The committee requests the advice of the minister in relation to the above.
[1] The committee notes that it previously commented on a similar issue on an advice-only basis. See Delegated legislation monitor 1 of 2017, National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – April 2017 reduction day) Determination 2016 [F2016L01963], pp 61-62.
[2] See Regulations and Ordinances Committee, Guideline on consultation, http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Regulations_and_Ordinances/Guidelines/consultation.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/cth/AUSStaCSDLM/2017/235.html