LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Re-evaluating False Patent Marking in Australia"    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission	[2012] HCA 39; (2012) 247 CLR 486; (2012) 291 ALR 399; (2012) 91 ACSR 128; (2012) 86 ALJR 1183	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	2 Oct 2012	AustLII		257
"Defining Unpatented Article: Why Labeling Products with Expired Patent Numbers Should Not Be False Marking"	(2011-2012) 95 Minnesota Law Review 650	Minnesota Law Review	United States	circa 2012	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"From Forest Group to the America Invents Act: False Patent Marking Comes Full Circle"	(2011-2012) 97 Iowa Law Review 1003	Iowa Law Review	United States	circa 2012	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"A Patently Public Concern: Using Public Nuisance Law to Fix the False Patent Marking Statue After the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act"	(2012) 80 George Washington Law Review 568	George Washington Law Review	United States	circa 2012	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"Pa-Trolling the False Marking Frontier: Giving Section 292 the Proper Makeover in Wake of the American Invents Act"	(2012) 190 Northern Illinois University Law Review 189	Northern Illinois University Law Review	United States	circa 2012	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Marksun Australia Pty Ltd	[2011] FCA 695; [2011] ATPR 42-363	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	23 Jun 2011	AustLII		32
"Off the Mark: Fixing the False Marking Statute"	(2011) 89 Texas Law Review 477	Texas Law Review	United States	circa 2011	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
Optimal Fines for False Patent Marking	(2010) 17 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 181	Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review	United States	circa 2010	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"Restoring Truth: An Argument to Remove the Qui Tam Provision from the false Marking Statute of the Patent Act"	(2010) 11 Minnesota Journal of Law Science and Technology 829	Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology	United States	circa 2010			1
"False Marking Stakes Raised in the US"	[2010] Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 115	Intellectual Property Law Bulletin	United States	circa 2010	HeinOnline		1
"The Flawed Nature Of The False Marking Statute"	(2009) 77 Tennessee Law Review 111	Tennessee Law Review	United States	circa 2009			1
Clontech Laboratories Inc v Invitrogen Corporation	406 F3d 1347	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	5 May 2005	WorldLII		2
"Deficiencies and Proposed Recommendations to the False Marking Statute: Controlling Use of the term “ Patent Pending ”"	(2004) 12 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 283	Journal of Intellectual Property Law	United States	circa 2004	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"The False Claims Act And The English Eradication Of Qui Tam Legislation"	(2000) 78 North Carolina Law Review 539	North Carolina Law Review	United States	circa 2000	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
Jiminez v R	[1992] HCA 14; (1992) 173 CLR 572; 106 ALR 162; 59 A Crim R 308; 66 ALJR 292; 15 MVR 289	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	6 May 1992	AustLII		264
Elconnex Pty Ltd v Gerard Industries Pty Ltd	[1991] FCA 567; 32 FCR 491; 105 ALR 247; (1991) 22 IPR 551; [1992] AIPC 90-848	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Nov 1991	AustLII		68
Banque Commerciale SA, En Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd	[1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 279; (1990) 92 ALR 53; (1990) 64 ALJR 244	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	circa 1990	AustLII		1302
Gardam v George Wills & Co Ltd	[1988] FCA 289; (1988) 82 ALR 415; 30 FLR 165; 12 IPR 194; [1988] ASC 58; [1988] ATPR 40-884	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	15 Aug 1988	AustLII		91
Ducret v Chaudhary's Oriental Carpet Palace Pty Ltd	(1987) 16 FCR 562; (1987) 76 ALR 183; [1987] ATPR 40-804; [1987] ASC 57; 30 A Crim R 42	Federal Court of Australia	Australia	circa 1987	Legal Online / Westlaw		15
Lennox v Megray Pty Ltd; Lennox v Gaggino	6 IPR 543; [1986] ATPR 40-640		Australia	circa 1986	LexisNexis AU		1
He Kaw Teh v R	[1985] HCA 43; (1985) 157 CLR 523; (1985) 60 ALR 449; 15 A Crim R 203; (1985) 59 ALJR 620; [1986] LRC (Crim) 553	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	11 Jul 1985	AustLII		831
Sherras v De Rutzen	[1985] 1 QB 918		United Kingdom	circa 1985	LexisNexis / Westlaw		9
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd	[1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191; (1982) 42 ALR 1; (1982) 56 ALJR 715; [1982] ATPR 40-307; 1A IPR 684; 1 TPR 282	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	11 Aug 1982	AustLII		1560
Temperley v Playground Supplies Pty Ltd	[1980] ATPR 40-164		Australia	circa 1980	IntelliConnect		2
Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers	[1977] UKHL 5; [1978] AC 435; [1977] 3 All ER 70; [1977] 3 WLR 300	House of Lords	United Kingdom	26 Jul 1977	BAILII		433
Given v CV Holland (Holdings) Pty Ltd	[1977] FCA 33; (1977) 29 FLR 212; [1977] ATPR 40-029	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	circa 1977	AustLII		58
Proudman v Dayman	[1941] HCA 28; (1941) 67 CLR 536	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Sep 1941	AustLII		405
Wallingford v Mutual Society	(1880) 5 AC 685; 50 LJQB 49		United Kingdom	circa 1880	LexisNexis / Westlaw		276
In re BP Lubricants USA Inc	637 F3d 1307		United States	circa 2004	Westlaw		1
Stauffer v Brooks Brothers Inc	619 F3d 1321		United States		Westlaw		1
Pequignot v Solo Cup	608 F3d 1356		United States		Westlaw		1
Forest Group Inc v Bon Tool Co	590 F3d 1295		United States		Westlaw		1
Pequignot v Solo Cup	540 FSupp 2d 649		United States		Westlaw		1
FLFMC LLC v Wham-o Inc	444 Fed Appx 447		United States		Westlaw		1
Sheldon Friedlich Marketing Corporation v Carol Wright Sales Inc	219 USPQ 883		United States	circa 2004			1
London v Everett H Dunbar Corporation	179 F 506			circa 2004			6
35 USC 292	35 USC 292	United States Code	United States	circa 2004	LII (Cornell)		18
35 US 292	35 US 292	United States Supreme Court	United States		Westlaw		1