Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics Inc
|
[2013] FCA 65; (2013) 99 IPR 567
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
15 Feb 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
11
|
"A Judicial Axe for Sharp Drafting: The “ Natural Phenomenon ” Dilemma"
|
(2012) 22 Journal of Law Information and Science 55
|
Journal of Law, Information and Science
|
Australia
|
circa 2012
|
HeinOnline
|
|
1
|
"Implications of DNA Patenting: Reviewing the Evidence"
|
(2011) 21 Journal of Law Information and Science 7
|
Journal of Law, Information and Science
|
Australia
|
circa 2011
|
HeinOnline
|
|
9 
|
"An “ Absence of Meaningful Appellate Review ” : Juries and Patent Obviousness"
|
(2010) 12 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 641
|
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law
|
United States
|
circa 2010
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
"Toward A More Reliable Fact-Finder In Patent Litigation"
|
(2009) 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 309
|
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 2009
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
|
[2004] UKHL 46; [2005] RPC 9; (2005) 28 IPD 28049; [2005] 1 All ER 667
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
21 Oct 2004
|
BAILII
|
|
305    
|
"The Isolation and Purification Exception to the General Unpatentability of Products of Nature"
|
(2003) 4 Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 1
|
Columbia Science and Technology Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 2003
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
"Inherent patentability in Anglo-Australian law: a history"
|
(2003) 14 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 109
|
Australian Intellectual Property Journal
|
Australia
|
circa 2003
|
Legal Online
|
|
5 
|
"Reinventing The Double Helix: A Novel And Nonobvious Reconceptualization Of The Biotechnology Patent"
|
(2002) 55 Stanford Law Review 303
|
Stanford Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 2002
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc
|
(2001) 534 US 124; 151 L Ed 2d 508; 122 SCt 593; 60 USPQ2d 1865
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
10 Dec 2001
|
WorldLII
|
|
28 
|
Biogen Inc v Medeva plc
|
[1996] UKHL 18; [1997] RPC 1; (1996) 38 BMLR 149; (1996) 36 IPR 438
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
31 Oct 1996
|
BAILII
|
|
626    
|
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Board of Regents of University of Washington
|
[1995] APO 61; (1995) 33 IPR 557; [1996] AIPC 37,352
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
19 Oct 1995
|
AustLII
|
|
15
|
Amgen, Inc v Chugai Pharmaceutical Co
|
927 F2d 1200; 59 USLW 2575; 18 USPQ2d 1016; 55 Empl Prac Dec P 40,580; 55 Fair Empl Prac Cas 178
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
20 May 1991
|
WorldLII
|
|
63  
|
Diamond v Diehr
|
450 US 175; 209 USPQ 1; 67 L Ed 2d 155; 101 SCt 1048
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
3 Mar 1981
|
WorldLII
|
|
64  
|
Diamond v Chakrabarty
|
447 US 303; 206 USPQ 193; 65 L Ed 2d 144; 100 SCt 2204
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
16 Jun 1980
|
WorldLII
|
|
101  
|
National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents
|
[1959] HCA 67; (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; 1A IPR 63
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
16 Dec 1959
|
AustLII
|
|
382    
|
Funk Bros Seed Co v Kalo Inoculant Co
|
333 US 127; 92 L Ed 588; 68 SCt 440; 76 USPQ 280
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
16 Feb 1948
|
WorldLII
|
|
48 
|
Dennis v Pitner
|
(1939) 106 F2d 142
|
|
United States
|
circa 1939
|
Westlaw
|
|
9
|
Hartranft v Wiegmann
|
121 US 609; 30 L Ed 1012; 7 SCt 1240
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
2 May 1887
|
WorldLII
|
|
26 
|
Cochrane v Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik
|
111 US 293; 28 L Ed 433; 4 SCt 455
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
14 Apr 1884
|
WorldLII
|
|
10
|
Wood-Paper Patent the American Wood-Paper Co v The Fibre Disintegrating Co the Fibre Disintegrating Co
|
90 US 566; 23 Wall 566; 23 L Ed 31
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
1 Oct 1874
|
WorldLII
|
|
12
|
Myriad (District Court)
|
702 FSupp 2d 181
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
8
|
Amp
|
689 F3d 1303
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
8
|
Amp
|
653 F3d 1329
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
10
|
In re Bergy
|
596 F2d 952
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
10
|
Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories Inc
|
566 US 66; 132 SCt 1289
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
16
|
In re Bergstrom
|
427 F2d 1394; 57 CCPA 1240
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
Re Seaborg
|
328 F2d 993
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
American Fruit Growers, Inc v Brogdex Co
|
283 US 1; 75 L Ed 801; 51 SCt 328
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
20
|
Merck & Co Inc v Olin Mathieson Chemical Co
|
253 F2d 156
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
7
|
Parke-Davis & Co v HK Mulford Co
|
189 F 95
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Union Carbide
|
181 F 104
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Kuehmsted
|
179 F 701
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics Inc
|
132 SCt 1794
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
3
|
Re King
|
107 F2d 618
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Re Marden (No 2)
|
47 F2d 958
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Re Marden (No 1)
|
47 F2d 957
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
General Electric
|
28 F2d 641
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
5
|