LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Forensic Science Evidence and the Conditions for Rational (Jury) Evaluation"     9

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
"Reconceptualising Reforms To Cross-Examination: Extending The Reliability Revolution Beyond The Forensic Sciences" [2021] CanLawRw 4	(2021) 18 Canberra Law Review 36	Kendall, Sarah	Australia	circa 2021	AustLII
"Facial Recognition and Image Comparison Evidence: Identification by Investigators, Familiars, Experts, Super-Recognisers and Algorithms"	(2021) 45 Melbourne University Law Review 99	Edmond, Gary; White, David; Towler, Alice; San Roque, Mehera; Kemp, Richard	Australia	circa 2021	AustLII
"The New Psychology of Expert Witness Procedure"	(2020) 42 Sydney Law Review 69	Chin, Jason M; San Roque, Mehera; McFadden, Rory	Australia	circa 2020	AustLII		1
"Forensic Science Evidence and the Limits of Cross-Examination"	(2019) 42 Melbourne University Law Review 858	Edmond, Gary; Cunliffe, Emma; Martire, Kristy; San Roque, Mehera	Australia	circa 2019	AustLII		3
"Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence"	(2019) 38 University of Queensland Law Journal 183	Chin, Jason M; Goss, Caitlin	Australia	circa 2019	AustLII
"The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise"	(2019) 38 University of Queensland Law Journal 237	Searston, Rachel A; Chin, Jason M	Australia	circa 2019	AustLII		2
"Performance Claims in Forensic Science Expert Opinion Evidence"	(2019) 38 University of Queensland Law Journal 261	Smith, Chloe A; Thompson, Matthew B	Australia	circa 2019	AustLII		1
"Icarus and the Evidence Act: Section 137, Probative Value and Taking Forensic Science Evidence 'at its Highest'"	(2017) 41 Melbourne University Law Review 106	Edmond, Gary	Australia	circa 2017	AustLII		6
"Rethinking Expert Opinion Evidence"	(2017) 40 Melbourne University Law Review 967	Martire, Kristy A; Edmond, Gary	Australia	circa 2017	AustLII		5

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Tuite v R	[2015] VSCA 148; (2015) 49 VR 196	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	12 Jun 2015	AustLII		46
R v Bornyk	[2015] BCJ No 94		Canada - British Columbia	circa 2015			1
"Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony"	(2014) 81 University of Chicago Law Review 417	University of Chicago Law Review	United States	circa 2014	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		4
"How to Cross-Examine Forensic Scientists: A Guide for Lawyers"	(2014) 39 Australian Bar Review 174	Australian Bar Review	Australia	circa 2014	LexisNexis AU		5
"Judging Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination"	(2014) 18 International Journal of Evidence & Proof 139	International Journal of Evidence & Proof	United Kingdom	circa 2014	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"Gaitkeeping in Canada: Mis-steps in Assessing the Reliability of Expert Testimony"	(2014) 92 Canadian Bar Review 327	Canadian Bar Review	Canada	circa 2014			2
Honeysett v R	(2014) 253 CLR 122		Australia - Commonwealth	circa 2014	Legal Online / Westlaw		108
"Christie, Section 137 and Forensic Science Evidence (after Dupas v R and R v XY)"	(2014) 40 Monash University Law Review 389	Monash University Law Review	Australia	circa 2014	AustLII		5
"The Admissibility of Forensic Science and Medicine Evidence under the Uniform Evidence Law"	(2014) 38 Criminal Law Journal 136	Criminal Law Journal	Australia	circa 2014	Legal Online		10
"A Guide to Interpreting Forensic Testimony: Scientific Approaches to Fingerprint Evidence"	(2014) 13 Law Probability & Risk 1	Law, Probability & Risk	United Kingdom	circa 2014	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		3
Kosian v R	[2013] VSCA 357; (2013) 40 VR 335; (2013) 237 A Crim R 156	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	6 Dec 2013	AustLII		6
Penza and Di Maria v R	[2013] NSWCCA 21	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	15 Feb 2013	AustLII		17
Ma v R	[2013] VSCA 20; (2013) 40 VR 564; (2013) 226 A Crim R 575	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	14 Feb 2013	AustLII		31
"Is Expert Evidence Really Different?"	(2013) 89 Notre Dame Law Review 1	Notre Dame Law Review	United States	circa 2013	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		3
(2013) 37 Law and Human Behavior 424	(2013) 37 Law and Human Behavior 424	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2013	Westlaw		1
R v Bornyk	[2013] BCJ No 2313		Canada - British Columbia	circa 2013			1
"The Psychology of Interpreting Expert Evaluative Opinions"	(2013) 45 Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 305	Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences	Australia	circa 2013			5
"(Ad)Ministering Justice: Expert Evidence and the Professional Responsibilities of Prosecutors"	(2013) 36 University of New South Wales Law Journal 921	University of New South Wales Law Journal	Australia	circa 2013	AustLII		3
R v Xy	(2013) 84 NSWLR 363		Australia - New South Wales	circa 2013	LexisNexis AU		48
Dupas v R	[2012] VSCA 328; (2012) 40 VR 182; (2012) 218 A Crim R 507	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	21 Dec 2012	AustLII		140
Gilham v R	[2012] NSWCCA 131; (2012) 224 A Crim R 22	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	25 Jun 2012	AustLII		81
Aytugrul v R	[2012] HCA 15; (2012) 247 CLR 170; (2012) 286 ALR 441; 86 ALJR 474; (2012) 215 A Crim R 501	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	18 Apr 2012	AustLII		84
Wood v R	[2012] NSWCCA 21; (2012) 84 NSWLR 581	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	24 Feb 2012	AustLII		129
R v Aitken	[2012] BCJ No 632		Canada - British Columbia	circa 2012			1
"Proficiency Tests To Estimate Error Rates in the Forensic Sciences"	(2012) 12 Law Probability & Risk 89	Law, Probability & Risk	United Kingdom	circa 2012	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"A Call for Clarity in the Use of Social Science Research in Family Law Decision-Making"	(2012) 26 Australian Journal of Family Law 81	Australian Journal of Family Law	Australia	circa 2012	LexisNexis AU		5
Morgan v R	[2011] NSWCCA 257; (2011) 215 A Crim R 33	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	1 Dec 2011	AustLII		28
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar	[2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588; (2011) 277 ALR 611; (2011) 85 ALJR 694; (2011) 9 DDCR 25	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Jun 2011	AustLII		896
Otway v R	[2011] EWCA Crim 3	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	14 Jan 2011	BAILII		6
"The Criminal Law - A 'Mildly Vituperative' Critique"	(2011) 35 Melbourne University Law Review 1177	Melbourne University Law Review	Australia	circa 2011	AustLII		7
"Expert Testimony Regarding Child Witnesses: Does It Sensitize Jurors to Forensic Interview Quality?"	(2011) 35 Law and Human Behavior 152	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2011	Westlaw		1
"Procedural Fairness, the Criminal Trial and Forensic Science and Medicine"	(2011) 33 Sydney Law Review 359	Sydney Law Review	Australia	circa 2011	AustLII		8
"The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences"	(2011) 58 UCLA Law Review 725	UCLA Law Review	United States	circa 2011	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		6
"Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence"	(2011) 35 Law and Human Behavior 60	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2011	Westlaw		1
Aytugrul v R	[2010] NSWCCA 272; (2010) 205 A Crim R 157	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	3 Dec 2010	AustLII		19
R v t	[2010] EWCA Crim 2439; [2011] 1 Cr App R 9	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	26 Oct 2010	BAILII		8
"The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear"	(2009) 33 Law and Human Behavior 436	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2009	Westlaw		4
"Forensics without Uniqueness, Conclusions without Individualization: The New Epistemology of Forensic Identification"	(2009) 8 Law Probability & Risk 233	Law, Probability & Risk	United Kingdom	circa 2009	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd (in liq) v Selim	[2008] FCA 416	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	2 Apr 2008	AustLII		15
R v G	[2008] UKHL 37; [2009] 1 AC 92; [2008] 3 All ER 91; [2008] 2 BCLC 281; [2008] All ER (D) 216; [2008] 1 WLR 1379; [2009] 1 Cr App R 8; [2008] Crim LR 818; [2008] HRLR 36; [2009] UKHRR 72; [2008] BCC 323	House of Lords	United Kingdom	circa 2008	BAILII		176
"The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence"	(2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 199	Vanderbilt Law Review	United States	circa 2008	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		6
"The Effectiveness of Opposing Expert Witnesses for Educating Jurors about Unreliable Expert Evidence"	(2008) 32 Law and Human Behavior 363	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2008	Westlaw		2
"Innocents at Risk: Adversary Imbalance, Forensic Science, and the Search for Truth"	(2008) 38 Seton Hall Law Review 893	Seton Hall Law Review	United States	circa 2008	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		6
Murdoch v R	[2007] NTCCA 1; (2007) 167 A Crim R 329	Supreme Court of the Northern Territory - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - Northern Territory	10 Jan 2007	AustLII		33
"Statistical Inference and Forensic Evidence: Evaluating a Bullet Lead Match"	(2007) 31 Law and Human Behavior 433	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2007	Westlaw		1
R v Jung	[2006] NSWSC 658	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	29 Jun 2006	AustLII		20
R v Tang	[2006] NSWCCA 167; (2006) 65 NSWLR 681; (2006) 161 A Crim R 377	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	24 May 2006	AustLII		78
Hillstead v R	[2005] WASCA 116	Supreme Court of Western Australia - Court of Appeal	Australia - Western Australia	23 Jun 2005	AustLII		23
R v Madigan	[2005] NSWCCA 170	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	9 Jun 2005	AustLII		14
"Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury"	(2005) 2 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 171	Journal of Empirical Legal Studies	United States	circa 2005			2
"Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform"	(2005) 33 Federal Law Review 95	Federal Law Review	Australia	circa 2005	AustLII		4
Li v R	[2003] NSWCCA 290; (2003) 139 A Crim R 281	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	23 Oct 2003	AustLII		43
Jurors ’ Evaluation of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message ’	(2003) 66 Law & Social Inquiry 441	Law & Social Inquiry	United States	circa 2003	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
Velevski v R	[2002] HCA 4; (2002) 187 ALR 233; (2002) 76 ALJR 402; (2002) 23 Leg Rep C5	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	14 Feb 2002	AustLII		132
R v GK	[2001] NSWCCA 413; (2001) 53 NSWLR 317; (2001) 125 A Crim R 315	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	16 Oct 2001	AustLII		105
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles	[2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; (2001) 25 NSWCCR 218	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	14 Sep 2001	AustLII		2270
"Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics"	(2001) 87 Virginia Law Review 1857	Virginia Law Review	United States	circa 2001	LexisNexis		4
"Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World"	(2001) 25 Law and Human Behavior 433	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2001	Westlaw		4
"Juries and Expert Evidence"	(2001) 66 Brooklyn Law Review 1121	Brooklyn Law Review	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
"Inside the Judicial Mind"	(2001) 86 Cornell Law Review 777	Cornell Law Review	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		9
"When Are People Persuaded By Dna Match Statistics?"	(2001) 25 Law and Human Behavior 493	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2001	Westlaw		1
"The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA-Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient"	(2001) 74 Southern California Law Review 1275	Southern California Law Review	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		5
Gilbert v R	(2000) 201 CLR 414; (2000) 170 ALR 88; (2000) 74 ALJR 676; (2000) 21 Leg Rep C1		Australia - Commonwealth	circa 2000	Legal Online / Westlaw		409
"Permitting Jury Discussions During Trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform"	(2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 359	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2000	Westlaw		1
"The “Hired Gun” Effect: Assessing the Effect of Pay, Frequency of Testifying, and Credentials on the Perception of Expert Testimony"	(2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 149	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2000	Westlaw		2
"Amicus Brief: Kumho Tire v Carmichael"	(2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 387	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2000	Westlaw		1
R v Leung	[1999] NSWCCA 287; (1999) 47 NSWLR 405	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	15 Sep 1999	AustLII		62
HG v R	[1999] HCA 2; (1999) 197 CLR 414; 160 ALR 554; (1999) 73 ALJR 281; (1999) 2 Leg Rep C9	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	9 Feb 1999	AustLII		547
"Juror Reactions to DNA Evidence: Errors and Expectancies"	(1999) 23 Law and Human Behavior 159	Law and Human Behavior		circa 1999	Westlaw		2
"Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process"	(1998) 107 Yale Law Journal 1535	Yale Law Journal	United States	circa 1998	HeinOnline / Westlaw		4
"Removing the People from the Legal Process: the Rhetoric and Research on Judicial Selection and Juries"	(1997) 3 Psychology Public Policy and Law 242	Psychology, Public Policy, and Law		circa 1997	LexisNexis		1
"Novel Scientific Evidence and Controversial Cases: A Social Psychological Examination"	(1997) 21 Law & Psychology Review 1	Law & Psychology Review	United States	circa 1997	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates"	(1996) 67 University of Colorado Law Review 859	University of Colorado Law Review	United States	circa 1996	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		3
"Juror Reactions to Attorneys at Trial"	(1996) 87 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 17	Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology	United States	circa 1996	HeinOnline		1
"Complex Scientific Testimony: How Do Jurors Make Decisions?"	(1996) 20 Law and Human Behavior 379	Law and Human Behavior		circa 1996	Westlaw		2
"The Random Match Probability in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial?"	(1995) 35 Jurimetrics 201	Jurimetrics	United States	circa 1995	HeinOnline		4
"A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation"	(1994) 12 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 113	Behavioral Sciences and the Law		circa 1994			2
"Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Effects of Expert Evidence Type and Cross-examination"	(1994) 18 Law and Human Behavior 653	Law and Human Behavior		circa 1994	Westlaw		1
Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc	509 US 579; 43 F3d 13; 113 SCt 2786; 125 L Ed 2d 469; 125 L Ed 2; (1993) 27 Idaho 2797; 61 USLW 4805; 27 USPQ2d 1200	United States Supreme Court	United States	28 Jun 1993	WorldLII		1085
"Jury deliberation in a complex case: Havner v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals"	(1993) 16 Justice System Journal 45	Justice System Journal	United States	circa 1993	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education"	(1993) 87 Northwestern University Law Review 1131	Northwestern University Law Review	United States	circa 1993	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		5
R v Yuill	(1993) 69 A Crim R 450		Australia	circa 1993	Legal Online / Westlaw		45
R v Glennon	[1992] HCA 16; (1992) 173 CLR 592; (1992) 106 ALR 177; (1992) 66 ALJR 344; 60 A Crim R 18	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	6 May 1992	AustLII		490
"Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts and the Civil Jury"	(1992) 26 Law and Society Review 513	Law and Society Review	United States	circa 1992			1
(1991) 16 Law & Social Inquiry 323	(1991) 16 Law & Social Inquiry 323	Law & Social Inquiry	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"Citizen comprehension of difficult issues: Lessons from civil jury trials"	(1991) 40 American University Law Review 727	American University Law Review	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		3
"A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model"	(1991) 13 Cardozo Law Review 519	Cardozo Law Review	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		6
R v Robb	(1991) 93 Cr App R 161		United Kingdom	circa 1991	LexisNexis		28
"Expert testimony and jury decision making: an empirical analysis"	(1989) 7 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 215	Behavioral Sciences and the Law		circa 1989			2
"Are Juries Competent to Evaluate Statistical Evidence?"	(1989) 52 Law and Contemporary Problems 9	Law and Contemporary Problems	United States	circa 1989	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
Lewis v R	[1987] NTCCA 3; (1987) 88 FLR 104; 29 A Crim R 261	Supreme Court of the Northern Territory - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - Northern Territory	17 Jul 1987	AustLII		25
"The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field"	(1987) 38 Hastings Law Journal 814	Hastings Law Journal	United States	circa 1987	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		3
Kingswell v R	[1985] HCA 72; (1985) 159 CLR 264; 62 ALR 161; (1986) 60 ALJR 17; 19 A Crim R 65	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	18 Nov 1985	AustLII		243
R v Carroll	(1985) 19 A Crim R 10		Australia	circa 1985	Legal Online / Westlaw		1
R v Abadom	[1983] 1 All ER 364; [1983] 1 WLR 126; (1983) 76 Cr App R 48; [1983] Crim LR 254		United Kingdom	circa 1983	LexisNexis		62
Id (citing Richard O Lempert, Civil Juries and Complex Cases: Let's Not Rush to Judgment	(1981) 80 Michigan Law Review 68	Michigan Law Review	United States	circa 1981	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"Persuading the Jury with Facts Not in Evidence: The Fiction – Science Spectrum"	(1956) 105 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139	University of Pennsylvania Law Review	United States	circa 1956	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh	[1953] SC 34; [1953] SLT 54		United Kingdom - Scotland	circa 1953			357
Davies and Cody v R	[1937] HCA 27; (1937) 57 CLR 170	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	4 Jun 1937	AustLII		353
Parker v R	[1912] HCA 29; (1912) 14 CLR 681	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	23 May 1912	AustLII		16
"Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony"	(1901) 15 Harvard Law Review 40	Harvard Law Review	United States	circa 1901	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		21
99 Er 589	99 ER 589		United Kingdom	circa 1901	CommonLII		19
"The Jury as Critic: An Empirical Look at How Capital Juries Perceive Expert and Law Testimony"	83 Virginia Law Review 1109	Virginia Law Review	United States		LexisNexis		3
"Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of Its Meaning and Its Effects"	18 Law and Human Behavior 29	Law and Human Behavior			Westlaw		2
12 Law and Human Behavior 1	12 Law and Human Behavior 1	Law and Human Behavior			Westlaw		3
Criminal Trials, The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy	11 Law and Human Behavior 167	Law and Human Behavior			Westlaw		3