LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"On the Legality of Gene Patents"   flag  2

(2005) 29 Melbourne University Law Review 809
Nicol, Dianne
Melbourne University Law Review
Australia

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Implications of DNA Patenting: Reviewing the Evidence" [2011] JlLawInfoSci 3 Nicol, Dianne Australia circa 2011 AustLII flag
" 'In Review' Celebration of Scholarship" [2011] MonashULawRw 26 Brennan, Gerard Australia circa 2011 AustLII flag

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s6, s7, s18, s40, s62, s68, s133, s163, s135

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
In re Fisher 421 F3d 1365 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 7 Sep 2005 WorldLII flag 9
"Australian Medical Biotechnology: Navigating a Complex Patent Landscape" [2005] European Intellectual Property Review 313 European Intellectual Property Review United Kingdom circa 2005 Westlaw flag 3
"The Impact of Trips on the Validity of the European Biotechnology Directive" (2005) 2 Journal of International Biotechnology Law 62 Journal of International Biotechnology Law Germany circa 2005 flag 1
"Contrasting patterns of Y chromosome and mtDNA variation in Africa: evidence for sex-biased demographic processes" [2005] European Journal of Human Genetics 1 European Journal of Human Genetics circa 2005 2
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] 1 All ER 667 United Kingdom circa 2005 LexisNexis flag 92
Re David Wallach Hartmut Engelmann Dan Aderka Daniela Novick and Menachem Rubinstein 378 F3d 1330 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 11 Aug 2004 WorldLII flag 2
"Open Source Patenting" (2004) 1 Journal of International Biotechnology Law 221 Journal of International Biotechnology Law Germany circa 2004 flag 1
"An Analysis of the Approach of the Trilateral and Australian Patent Offi ces to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs)" (2004) 15 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 156 Australian Intellectual Property Journal Australia circa 2004 Legal Online flag 1
"European Opposition to Exclusive Control Over Predictive Breast Cancer Testing and the Inherent Implications for U.S. Patent Law and Public Policy: A Case Study of the Myriad Genetics’ Brca Patent Controversy" (2004) 59 Food and Drug Law Journal 133 Food and Drug Law Journal United States circa 2004 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 1
"Engaging Facts And Policy: A Multi-Institutional Approach To Patent System Reform" (2003) 103 Columbia Law Review 1035 Columbia Law Review United States circa 2003 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 4
Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 59; (2002) 212 CLR 411; (2002) 194 ALR 485; (2002) 56 IPR 129; (2002) 77 ALJR 398; [2003] AIPC 91-838 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 12 Dec 2002 AustLII flag 572
Enzo Biochem Inc v Gen-Probe Incorporated Usa Sa 296 F3d 1316 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 15 Jul 2002 WorldLII flag 6
"Australian Medical Biotechnology Industry and Access to Intellectual Property: Issues for Patent Law Development, The" (2001) 23 Sydney Law Review 347 Sydney Law Review Australia circa 2001 AustLII flag 11
Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-377/98) [2001] ECR I-7079 Europe circa 2001 flag 23
Festo Corporation v Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co 234 F3d 558; 56 USPQ2d 1865 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 29 Nov 2000 WorldLII flag 49
Flexible Steel Lacing Co v Beltreco Ltd [2000] FCA 890; (2000) 49 IPR 331; [2000] AIPC 37,599 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 7 Jul 2000 AustLII flag 216
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v FH Faulding & Co Ltd [2000] FCA 316; (2000) 97 FCR 524; (2000) 170 ALR 439; (2000) 46 IPR 553; [2000] AIPC 37,298 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 22 Mar 2000 AustLII flag 306
"Biotechnology, patents and public policy: a proposal for reform in Australia" (2000) 11 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 202 Australian Intellectual Property Journal Australia circa 2000 Legal Online flag 11
Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth of Australia [2000] HCA 14; (2000) 202 CLR 479; 170 ALR 111; (2000) 46 IPR 515; (2000) 74 ALJR 648; (2000) 21 Leg Rep 2; [2000] AIPC 91-545 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth circa 2000 AustLII flag 197
"Patenting Genetic Materials — Failing to Reflect the Value of Variation in DNA, RNA and Amino Acids" (2000) 11 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 69 Australian Intellectual Property Journal Australia circa 2000 Legal Online flag 4
"Changing Intellectual Property Issues in the Biotechnology Industry" (1999) 18 Biotechnology Law Report 3 Biotechnology Law Report United States circa 1999 flag 1
Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (No 3) (1998) 156 ALR 30; (1998) 41 IPR 325; [1998] AIPC 37,437 Australia circa 1998 LexisNexis AU flag 16
Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co 119 F3d 1559; 43 USPQ2d 1398 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 24 Oct 1997 WorldLII flag 36
Genentech Inc v Chiron Corporation 112 F3d 495; 42 USPQ2d 1608 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 25 Apr 1997 WorldLII flag 9
Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1996] UKHL 18; [1997] RPC 1; (1996) 38 BMLR 149; (1996) 36 IPR 438 House of Lords United Kingdom 31 Oct 1996 BAILII flag 628
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Board of Regents of University of Washington [1995] APO 61; (1995) 33 IPR 557; [1996] AIPC 37,352 IP Australia - Australian Patent Office Australia 19 Oct 1995 AustLII flag 15
Re Thomas F Deuel Yue-Sheng Li Ned R Siegel and Peter G Milner 51 F3d 1552; 34 USPQ2d 1210; 63 USLW 2624 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 28 Mar 1995 WorldLII flag 9
Hormone Relaxin [1995] EPOR 541 Europe circa 1995 flag 5
Plant Genetic Systems and Greenpeace T356/93 [1995] EPOR 357 Europe circa 1995 flag 3
Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd v Rescare Ltd [1994] FCA 1065; (1994) 50 FCR 1; (1994) 122 ALR 141; [1994] AIPC 91-076; 28 IPR 383 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 5 May 1994 AustLII flag 77
Gats (1994) 1867 UNTS 3 International circa 1994 flag 143
Rescare Ltd v Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 811; (1992) 111 ALR 205; (1992) 25 IPR 119 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth circa 1992 AustLII flag 101
"On Patenting Genes" (1992) 327 New England Journal of Medicine 664 New England Journal of Medicine United States circa 1992 flag 2
Amgen, Inc v Chugai Pharmaceutical Co 927 F2d 1200; 59 USLW 2575; 18 USPQ2d 1016; 55 Empl Prac Dec P 40,580; 55 Fair Empl Prac Cas 178 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit United States 20 May 1991 WorldLII flag 63
Genentech Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd [1989] RPC 147; (1989) 15 IPR 423 circa 1989 LexisNexis AU 58
Rehm v Websters Security Systems (1988) 81 ALR 79 Australia circa 1988 LexisNexis AU flag 222
"Patenting Biotechnology: A Practical Approach" (1985) 11 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 407 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal United States circa 1985 flag 2
Populin v HB Nominees Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 37; 41 ALR 471; (1982) 59 FLR 37 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 26 Mar 1982 AustLII flag 131
Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183; [1981] FSR 60 United Kingdom circa 1981 flag 559
Diamond v Chakrabarty 447 US 303; 206 USPQ 193; 65 L Ed 2d 144; 100 SCt 2204 United States Supreme Court United States 16 Jun 1980 WorldLII flag 101
Ranks Hovis McDougall Ltd (1976) 46 Australian Official Journal of Patents Trade Marks and Designs 3915 Australian Official Journal of Patents, Trade Marks and Designs Australia circa 1976 flag 5
(1973) 1065 Unts 254 (1973) 1065 UNTS 254 International circa 1973 flag 3
Joos v Commissioner of Patents [1972] HCA 38; (1972) 126 CLR 611; [1972-73] ALR 831; [1973] RPC 59; 46 ALJR 438; 1A IPR 172 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 25 Jul 1972 AustLII flag 38
Brenner v Manson 383 US 519; 148 USPQ 689; 16 L Ed 2d 69; 86 SCt 1033 United States Supreme Court United States 21 Mar 1966 WorldLII flag 50
National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67; (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; 1A IPR 63 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 16 Dec 1959 AustLII flag 384
Graver Tank & Mfg Co v Linde Air Products Co 339 US 605; 85 USPQ 328; 94 L Ed 1097; 70 SCt 854; 94 L Ed 2d 1097; [1950] Dec Commr Pat 597; 87 USPQ2d 328 United States Supreme Court United States 29 May 1950 WorldLII flag 464
Lane Fox v Kensington and Knightsbridge Electric Lighting Co [1892] UKLawRpCh 139; [1892] 3 Ch 424; (1892) 9 RPC 416 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 10 Aug 1892 CommonLII flag 39
Statute of Monopolies 1623 23 Jac 1 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 2004 flag 7
991 f2d 781 991 F2d 781 United States circa 2004 Westlaw flag 19
"Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office" 95 Northwestern University Law Review 1495 Northwestern University Law Review United States circa 2004 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 9
35 USC 112 35 USC 112 United States Code United States circa 2004 LII (Cornell) flag 365

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback