LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Taylor v Smith |
[1892] UKLawRpKQB 52; |
United Kingdom | 1 Mar 1892 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Watson v The Royal Permanent Building Society |
[1888] VicLawRp 87; |
Australia - Victoria | 26 Jul 1888 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Garfield v Paris |
96 US 557; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 1 Oct 1877 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Brandon J , and Roskill LJ : Mead v South Eastern Railway Co |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1870 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
In The Matter of an Appeal in The Clerkenwell County Court in an Interpleader between C Furber, Plaintiff and Claimant, and G J Sturmey, Defendant and Execution Creditor |
[1858] EngR 719; |
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom | circa 1858 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Blenkinsop v Clayton |
[1817] EngR 555; |
Court of Common Pleas | United Kingdom | circa 1817 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Dawes v Peck |
[1799] EngR 835; |
United Kingdom | circa 1799 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
14 M & W 377 |
|
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
14 M & W 3 |
|
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Hiinf v Hwht |
|
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
But III Kmnt v Her |
|
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
6 WR 725 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
6 WR 625 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Elmme v Stone |
|
Court of Common Pleas | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
1 East 19 |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |