LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

R v Casey Melbourne Tramway and Omnibus Co Ltd v The Mayor, & c, of Fitzroy   flag  1

[1899] ArgusLawRp 74; (1899) 5 ALR 152
Argus Law Reports
Australia
12th June, 1899

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works v Metropolitan Gas Co [1903] ArgusLawRp 81; (1903) 9 ALR 149 Argus Law Reports Australia 12 Aug 1903 AustLII flag

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Coroners Act 1890 (Vic)
Infant Life Protection Act 1890 (Vic)
Justices Act 1890 (Vic)
Local Government Act 1890 (Vic)
Local Government Act 1891 (Vic)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Melbourne Tramway and Omnibus Co Ltd v Mayor, & c, of Melbourne [1898] ArgusLawRp 52; (1898) 4 ALR 95 Argus Law Reports Australia 12 May 1898 AustLII flag 3
Lambeth Overseers v London County Council [1897] UKLawRpAC 33; [1897] AC 625 United Kingdom 19 Jul 1897 CommonLII flag 25
County Council of Middlesex v Assessment Committee of St George's Union [1896] UKLawRpKQB 188; (1897) 1 QB 64 United Kingdom 30 Nov 1896 CommonLII flag 8
Holywell Union (Assessment Committee Of) v Halkyn District Mines Drainage Co [1894] UKLawRpAC 68; [1895] AC 117 United Kingdom 17 Dec 1894 CommonLII flag 20
Sculcoates Union v Hull Docks [1894] UKLawRpAC 60; [1895] AC 136 United Kingdom 23 Nov 1894 CommonLII flag 22
London County Council v Erith Parish [1893] UKLawRpAC 52; [1893] AC 562 United Kingdom 8 Sep 1893 CommonLII flag 61
Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of Borough of Burton-Upon-Trent v Assessment Committee of Burton-Upon-Trent Union and Churchwardens and Overseers of Poor of Township of Stretton [1889] UKLawRpKQB 186; 24 QBD 197; 59 LJMC 1 Queen's Bench United Kingdom 27 Nov 1889 CommonLII flag 5
(1877) 36 LT 109 (1877) 36 LT 109 United Kingdom circa 1877 flag 3
Jones ,-Plaintiffs in Error; "The Mersey Docks and Harbour Board" Trustees,-Defendants in Error [1865] EngR 610; [1861-73] All ER 78; 11 HLCas 443; 35 LJMC 1; 11 ER 1405; 11 HL 0 House of Lords United Kingdom circa 1861 CommonLII flag 92
R v West Middlesex Waterworks Co [1859] EngR 1052; 1 E & E 716; (1859) 28 LJMC 135; 120 ER 1078; 28 LJMC 84 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1859 CommonLII flag 17
R v The Co of Proprietors of the Blackfriars' Bridge [1839] EngR 467; 112 ER 1428; (1839) 9 A & E 828 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1839 CommonLII flag 3
R v The Cambridge Gas Light Co [1838] EngR 275; 8 A & E 73; 112 ER 763 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1838 CommonLII flag 9
R v Parrot [1794] EngR 2204; 5 TR 593; 101 ER 332 United Kingdom circa 1794 CommonLII flag 15
20 VLR 36 20 VLR 36 Australia - Victoria flag 2
20 VLR 3 20 VLR 3 Australia - Victoria flag 2
20 Vle 36 20 VLE 36 Australia - Victoria flag 1
19 LT 311 19 LT 311 United Kingdom flag 1
17 QBD 710 17 QBD 710 Queen's Bench United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
14 Vle 952 14 VLE 952 Australia - Victoria flag 1
1-1 VLR 952 1-1 VLR 952 Australia - Victoria flag 1
10 QB 208 10 QB 208 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 10
10 QB 7 10 QB 7 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 3
9 QB 9 9 QB 9 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 12
8 QB 445 8 QB 445 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 3
6 QB 179; 2 Car H & a 205 6 QB 179; 2 Car H & A 205 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 9
4 QB 276 4 QB 276 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 3
4 QB 18 4 QB 18 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 9
4 QB 15 4 QB 15 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 4
3l LT 319 3L LT 319 United Kingdom flag 1
Estendon v Blackwood 2 AC 583 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 2
Essendon v Blackwood 2 AC 574 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 12
R v Lee, LK 1 QB 241 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 8
R v Chaplin 1 B & Ad 926 Kings Bench United Kingdom flag 4
LR 9 QB 84 LR 9 QB 84 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 9
I 'confess to me, of our first hypothesis way line does not fall within the exception in sec 246 If either appellant or respondent suffers, it will be their It was further contended that the Co was not own fault liable to be rated in respect of these lines, as it did not For the rest, I think that the engine houses are part occupy the lines, but this argument is completely dis of the tramway, and cannot be divorced from the posed of by the decision in the Pimlico Tramway Co engines and other machinery which they shelter, and v Greenwich Union LR 9 QB 9 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 12

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback