LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
trustee who leased the trust property for 30 A v Kharef W B Pendharkar and years with a covenant for renewal for another M N Jog--for Respondent like term) enters into it knowing exactly what Judgment --This appeal arises out of the title of his vendor is, and that the carrying a suit for recovering damages arising out out of the contract eventually is subject to a pos sible difficulty, how can he turn round and say: of breach of a contract of sale entered `although, I entered into that contract with you into on 21st September 1928 by the de knowing of that difficulty, still I hold you liable- fendant Sakharam in favour of the for damages' " plaintiff Jairam The suit was dismissed The rule stated in Bain v Fother in the Court of first instance, but was gill (2) was only an affirmation of the decreed in appeal The defendant has principle enunciated in Flureau v therefore preferred this appeal Thornhill (4) That rule is regarded in The contract of sale was made with 1 | India - Maharashtra | circa 1924 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Gas Light and Coke Co v Towse |
[1887] UKLawRpCh 77; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 16 Mar 1887 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Bain v Fothergill |
[1874] UKLawRpHL 10; |
United Kingdom | 22 Jun 1874 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
11 Bom 272 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1924 |
![]() |
![]() |