[1935] Mad 389
|
[1935] Mad 389
|
|
India
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
4
|
Dafctafcraya Gopal v Muhamad Khan Fateh Khan
|
[1935] Bom 122
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
1
|
[1935] Bom 25
|
[1935] Bom 25
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
[1898] Or 1935
|
[1898] OR 1935
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
1
|
[1935] Bom 229
|
[1935] Bom 229
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
N Sundara Sviarao v S G-angamma
|
(1934) 9371933 CRC 1481
|
|
Canada
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
1
|
Pir Bakhsh v Mahomed Tahar
|
[1934] PC 235; 151 IC 326
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
5
|
Sher Bahadur v Emperor
|
[1934] Lah 667
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
2
|
[1934] Mad 506
|
[1934] Mad 506
|
|
India
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
2
|
[1934] Bom 59
|
[1934] Bom 59
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
2
|
Kasturi Lai v Goverdhan Dass
|
[1934] Lah 138
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1934
|
|
|
2
|
[1933] Australian Law Journal 1384
|
[1933] Australian Law Journal 1384
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
circa 1933
|
Legal Online
|
|
3
|
Abdul Rahman v Cassim & Sons (A I R
|
[1933] PC 58
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
10
|
Secy, of State v Bai Somi
|
[1933] Bom 350
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
Hamid Khan v Emperor
|
[1933] Nag 4
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
Subbayya v Yeeraya
|
[1933] Mad 65
|
|
India
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
Dahu Raut v Emperor
|
[1933] Cal 870
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
[1933] MWN 1270
|
[1933] MWN 1270
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
[1933] Nag 173
|
[1933] Nag 173
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
[1933] Lah 44
|
[1933] Lah 44
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
1
|
M Michael v Emperor
|
[1933] MW 1ST
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
2
|
[1933] Bom 304
|
[1933] Bom 304
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
4
|
[1932] Bom 196
|
[1932] Bom 196
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1932
|
|
|
2
|
Bhagvan v Hiraji,AIR
|
[1932] Bom 516
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1932
|
|
|
4
|
[1931] Bom 210
|
[1931] Bom 210
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
Haran Sheik v Ramesh Chandra
|
AIR 1931 Cal 622
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
3
|
Jasimuddin Sarkar v Emperor
|
[1931] Cal 22
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
1
|
Kadri v Khubmiya
|
[1931] Bom 388
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
Nanehlal v Umrao Singh
|
[1931] P 0
|
|
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
27 
|
Emperor v Pandurang
|
[1931] Bom 111
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
1
|
[1931] Lah 736
|
[1931] Lah 736
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
[1931] Bom 411
|
[1931] Bom 411
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
[1931] Bom 210--131
|
[1931] Bom 210--131
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
Ram Charitar Dubey v Emperor
|
[1931] Cal 10
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
1
|
[1931] PC 33
|
[1931] PC 33
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
17
|
[1930] Bom 98
|
[1930] Bom 98
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1930
|
|
|
1
|
[1930] Bom 595
|
[1930] Bom 595
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1930
|
|
|
2
|
Piare Lai v Ganpat
|
[1930] Lah 437
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1930
|
|
|
2
|
Nathan v Emperor
|
[1930] Mad 187
|
|
India
|
circa 1930
|
|
|
3
|
Re Cockerill
|
[1929] 2 Ch 131
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1929
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
15
|
[1929] Bom 107
|
[1929] Bom 107
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
3
|
[1929] PC 1
|
[1929] PC 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
3
|
Emperor v Laxman
|
[1929] Bom 309
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
2
|
[1929] Cal 528
|
[1929] Cal 528
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
2
|
Fasiuddin v Emperor
|
8 CWN 838; [1929] Nag 172
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
6
|
Walidad v Nizam-ud-din
|
[1929] Lah 48
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
3
|
[1929] Bom 250
|
[1929] Bom 250
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1929
|
|
|
1
|
1 SLR 37; [1929] Lah 48
|
1 SLR 37; [1929] Lah 48
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1929
|
LexisNexis
|
|
3
|
Bhagwan Manaji v Hiraji Premji
|
[1928] Cal 646
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
4
|
Raja v Emperor
|
[1928] Lah 462
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
3
|
Jiwam Dal Daga v Nilmani
|
[1928] PC 80
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
3
|
[1928] Bom 42
|
[1928] Bom 42
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
2
|
[1928] Bom 191
|
[1928] Bom 191
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
5
|
Sadhu Shaikh v Emperor
|
[1928] Cal 260
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
1
|
Hazara Sing v Emperor
|
[1928] Lah 257
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
2
|
Thimmappa v Tkimmappa
|
[1928] Mad 1028
|
|
India
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
3
|
C Bamiah v N Bamiah
|
[1927] Mad 778
|
|
India
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
2
|
Veeraragbavachariar v Advocate General
|
[1927] Mad 1073
|
|
India
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
10
|
Mafiza^di v Emperor
|
[1927] Cal 644
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
5
|
[1927] PC 176; 104 IC 257
|
[1927] PC 176; 104 IC 257
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
20
|
Emperor v Jahangir Oama
|
[1927] Bom 501
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
4
|
Abdul Rahman v Emperor
|
[1927] PC 44
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
25 
|
[1927] Mad 1011; 28 Cr LJ 1005
|
[1927] Mad 1011; 28 Cr LJ 1005
|
|
India
|
circa 1927
|
|
|
3
|
Menon v Krishnan
|
[1926] Mad 989
|
|
India
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
2
|
[1926] Mad 565
|
[1926] Mad 565
|
|
India
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
2
|
[1926] Mad 55
|
[1926] Mad 55
|
|
India
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
1
|
[1926] Cal 1061
|
[1926] Cal 1061
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
2
|
[1926] Mad 35
|
[1926] Mad 35
|
|
India
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
2
|
Bai Shanta v Umrao Amir
|
[1926] Bom 141
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1926
|
|
|
4
|
John Over v Muriel A J Over
|
[1925] Bom 23
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
[1925] PC 176; 87 IC 295
|
[1925] PC 176; 87 IC 295
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
10
|
Military Authori v ('25V12 A X R
|
[1925] PC 155; 87 IC 313
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
13
|
[1925] Mad 579
|
[1925] Mad 579
|
|
India
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
5
|
[1925] Mad 424
|
[1925] Mad 424
|
|
India
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
[1925] Mad 1
|
[1925] Mad 1
|
|
India
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
4
|
Mohammad Sadiq v Emperor
|
[1925] Lah 355
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
[1925] Cal 801
|
[1925] Cal 801
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
4
|
[1925] Bom 423
|
[1925] Bom 423
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
[1925] Bom 341
|
[1925] Bom 341
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
3
|
Theethumlai Gounder v King-Emperor
|
(1925) 67630 Cr LJ 205
|
|
India
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
Muhammad Kkamarali v Ranga Rao
|
[1925] Mad 593
|
|
India
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
4
|
Rakta v Emperor
|
[1925] Lah 399
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
Begu v Emperor
|
[1925] PC 130
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
10
|
Rajindra Narain Singh v Sundara Bibi
|
[1925] P 0
|
|
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
45 
|
John Over v Muriel A J Over
|
[1925] Bom 231
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
2
|
Ramprasad v Shrinivas
|
[1925] Bom 527
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1925
|
|
|
3
|
[1924] Cal 796
|
[1924] Cal 796
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
2
|
Chellam Naidu v Ramasami
|
14 Mad 379; AIR 1924 Lahore 559
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
5
|
Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Steam Navigation Co Ltd
|
[1924] 1 KB 575; [1923] All ER 656; (1923) 29 Com Cas 57
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1924
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
34 
|
Seodoyal v Joharmull
|
[1924] Cal 74
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
7
|
Aga Khan v Times Publishing Co
|
[1924] 1 KB 675
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1924
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
33 
|
[1924] Bom 510
|
[1924] Bom 510
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
1
|
[1924] AC 637
|
[1924] AC 637
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1924
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
[1923] Mad 693
|
[1923] Mad 693
|
|
India
|
circa 1923
|
|
|
1
|
[1923] Mad 426
|
[1923] Mad 426
|
|
India
|
circa 1923
|
|
|
5
|
[1923] Bom 27
|
[1923] Bom 27
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1923
|
|
|
2
|
[1922] Mad 497
|
[1922] Mad 497
|
|
India
|
circa 1922
|
|
|
1
|
Jai Berham v Kedar Nath Marwari
|
AIR 1922 PC 269
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1922
|
|
|
16
|
[1922] Lah 369
|
[1922] Lah 369
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1922
|
|
|
3
|
Kdmaran v Emperor
|
[1922] Mad 35
|
|
India
|
circa 1922
|
|
|
4
|
[1921] Cal 1
|
[1921] Cal 1
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1921
|
|
|
6
|
Tayaballi v Dohad Municipality
|
[1920] Bom 9
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
2
|
Ramchand Manjimal v Gower Dhandas (A I R
|
[1920] PC 86
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
14
|
[1920] Cal 439
|
[1920] Cal 439
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
3
|
[1920] Cal 624
|
[1920] Cal 624
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
3
|
[1920] Cal 795
|
[1920] Cal 795
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
1
|
G D M Hindley v Joynarain Marwari
|
[1920] Cal 305
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
3
|
Lucas v Official Assignee of Bengal
|
[1920] Cal 1
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
2
|
62 Act 1920
|
62 Act 1920
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
2
|
[1919] PC 55
|
[1919] PC 55
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
14
|
[1918] Nag 181
|
[1918] Nag 181
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1918
|
|
|
2
|
[1918] Hag Adm 181
|
[1918] Hag Adm 181
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1918
|
|
|
2
|
[1918] Bom 123
|
[1918] Bom 123
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1918
|
|
|
2
|
Singh v Emperor
|
[1917] PC 25; 39 IC 311
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
14
|
Arfan Ali v Emperor
|
[1917] Cal 648
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
3
|
[1917] PC 101
|
[1917] PC 101
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
4
|
[1917] PC 1011
|
[1917] PC 1011
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
1
|
[1917] Cal 546
|
[1917] Cal 546
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
3
|
Amircband v Bakshi Harihar Prasad Singh
|
[1915] PC 88
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1915
|
|
|
1
|
Monro v Bognor Urban Council
|
[1915] 3 KB 167
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1915
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
13
|
Emperor v Madan Mandal
|
[1915] Cal 292
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1915
|
|
|
2
|
Burjorji v Bhagwandas
|
[1914] Bom 319
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
2
|
[1914] Bom 141
|
[1914] Bom 141
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
2
|
[1914] Bom 148
|
[1914] Bom 148
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
2
|
Chhogomal v Jainarain
|
[1914] Bom 142
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
1
|
Mohaomed Musa & Others v Aghore Kumar Ganguli
|
AIR 1914 PC 27
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
23 
|
[1914] Cal 597
|
[1914] Cal 597
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
1
|
Bristol Corporation v Aird (John) & Co
|
[1913] UKLawRpAC 9; [1913] AC 241; 29 TLR 360
|
|
United Kingdom
|
13 Mar 1913
|
CommonLII
|
|
32 
|
(1913) 40 Cal 710
|
(1913) 40 Cal 710
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1913
|
|
|
4
|
Emperor v Rahim Khan
|
(1913) 7 SLR 118
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
Doleman & Sons v Ossett Corporation
|
[1912] UKLawRpKQB 114; [1912] 3 KB 257
|
|
United Kingdom
|
17 Jul 1912
|
CommonLII
|
|
50 
|
R v Shershewsky
|
(1912) 28 TLR 364; (1912) 17 Com Cas 176
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1912
|
LexisNexis
|
|
10
|
[1912] AC 180
|
[1912] AC 180
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1912
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Crawford & Law v Allan Line Steamship Co
|
[1911] UKLawRpAC 73; [1912] AC 130
|
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Dec 1911
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
Nathu Khan v Sewak Koeri
|
(1911) 9 IC 116
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1911
|
|
|
4
|
(1911) 35 Bom 310
|
(1911) 35 Bom 310
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1911
|
|
|
1
|
Shimweil v Baniram
|
(1909) 3 SLR 5
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1909
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
Emperor v Shewa Uka
|
[1909] 3 SLR 155
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1909
|
LexisNexis
|
|
3
|
Emperor v Mahomed
|
(1909) 3 SLR 167
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1909
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
(1908) 31 Mad 469
|
(1908) 31 Mad 469
|
|
India
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
2
|
Ramjidas Poddar v Howse
|
(1908) 35 Cal 199
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
2
|
Panchu Das v Emperor
|
(1907) 34 Cal 698
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
4
|
(1906) 29 Mad 309; 26 Bom 109
|
(1906) 29 Mad 309; 26 Bom 109
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1906
|
|
|
17
|
Cia Naviera Vasconzada v Churchill & Sim
|
[1905] UKLawRpKQB 172; (1906) 1 KB 237
|
|
United Kingdom
|
30 Nov 1905
|
CommonLII
|
|
13
|
Chandulal v Sidhruthrai
|
(1905) 29 Bom 291
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1905
|
|
|
3
|
(1903) 5 Bom LR 5
|
(1903) 5 Bom LR 5
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1903
|
|
|
2
|
(1903) 5 Bom LR 978
|
(1903) 5 Bom LR 978
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1903
|
|
|
2
|
McMurdo, In re; Penfield v McMurdo
|
[1902] UKLawRpCh 110; (1902) 2 Ch 684
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
28 May 1902
|
CommonLII
|
|
12
|
Vifchal Das v Datta Ram
|
(1902) 26 Bom 298
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1902
|
|
|
2
|
Virupase v Shidapna
|
(1902) 26 Bom 109--3
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1902
|
|
|
2
|
Re Sharp Ex parte Gundrey
|
(1901) 83 LT 5
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1901
|
|
|
1
|
Queen-Empress v Basavanta
|
(1901) 25 Bom 46
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1901
|
|
|
1
|
Re Shaw, Ex parte Gill
|
(1901) 83 LT 487
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1901
|
|
|
4
|
(1899) 26 Cal 707
|
(1899) 26 Cal 707
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1899
|
|
|
7
|
King v Henderson
|
[1898] UKLawRpAC 33; [1898] AC 720
|
|
United Kingdom
|
23 Jun 1898
|
CommonLII
|
|
83  
|
Coppen v Moore (No 1)
|
[1898] UKLawRpKQB 59; (1898) 2 QB 300; 67 LJQB 690
|
|
United Kingdom
|
28 Mar 1898
|
CommonLII
|
|
6
|
[1897] Awn 174
|
[1897] AWN 174
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1897
|
|
|
2
|
(1896) 19 Mad 14
|
(1896) 19 Mad 14
|
|
India
|
circa 1896
|
|
|
1
|
(1894) 2 Ch D 478
|
(1894) 2 Ch D 478
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1894
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Sah Man Mull v Kanagasabapathi
|
(1893) 16 Mad 20
|
|
India
|
circa 1893
|
|
|
2
|
(1892) 19 Cal 688
|
(1892) 19 Cal 688
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1892
|
|
|
2
|
Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers
|
[1891] UKLawRpAC 6; [1891] AC 107; 60 LJQB 145; 7 TLR 333; 64 LT 353; 55 JP 676
|
|
United Kingdom
|
5 Mar 1891
|
CommonLII
|
|
201   
|
Turnock v Sartoris
|
[1889] UKLawRpCh 189; 43 Ch D 150
|
|
United Kingdom
|
11 Dec 1889
|
CommonLII
|
|
8
|
Turnock v Sartoris
|
(1889) 43 Ch D 160
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1889
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Hennessy v Wright
|
[1888] UKLawRpKQB 117; (1888) 21 QBD 509; 57 LJQB 530
|
|
United Kingdom
|
12 Jun 1888
|
CommonLII
|
|
52 
|
(1888) 12 Bom 137
|
(1888) 12 Bom 137
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1888
|
|
|
3
|
Crampton and Holt v Ridley & Co
|
[1887] UKLawRpKQB 176; 20 QBD 48
|
|
United Kingdom
|
18 Nov 1887
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
Weldon v Neal
|
[1887] UKLawRpKQB 161; 19 QBD 394; (1887) 56 LJQB 621
|
|
United Kingdom
|
9 Aug 1887
|
CommonLII
|
|
450    
|
Re Dillet
|
[1887] UKLawRpAC 13; (1887) 12 AC 459
|
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Mar 1887
|
CommonLII
|
|
27 
|
(1887) 19 QBD 1394
|
(1887) 19 QBD 1394
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1887
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
[1887] Awn 149
|
[1887] AWN 149
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1887
|
|
|
2
|
Re Rosher
|
[1884] UKLawRpCh 141; 26 Ch D 801; 53 LJCh 722; 53 LJCh 572
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
28 May 1884
|
CommonLII
|
|
37 
|
(1884) 7 Mad 284
|
(1884) 7 Mad 284
|
|
India
|
circa 1884
|
|
|
3
|
Young v Buckett
|
(1881) 46 LT 266
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1881
|
|
|
1
|
Lee; ex parte Good
|
[1880] Eq 49
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1880
|
|
|
3
|
Luckumsey v Hurbun
|
(1880) 5 Bom 580
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1880
|
|
|
3
|
Ilurdman v North Eastern Railway Co
|
[1878] UKLawRpCP 17; 3 CPD 168
|
|
United Kingdom
|
1 Mar 1878
|
CommonLII
|
|
25 
|
Serjeant v Dale
|
[1877] UKLawRpKQB 82; (1877) 2 QBD 558
|
|
United Kingdom
|
29 Jun 1877
|
CommonLII
|
|
25 
|
Machine Manufacturers v Wilson
|
(1877) 3 AC 376
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1877
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
9
|
Broder v Saillard
|
[1876] UKLawRpCh 128; 2 Ch D 692
|
|
United Kingdom
|
22 Mar 1876
|
CommonLII
|
|
33 
|
Muirhead, Ex parte; In re Muirhead
|
[1876] UKLawRpCh 20; 2 Ch D 22
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
21 Jan 1876
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
Subbaiyar v Kristnaiyar
|
(1876-78) 1 Mad 883
|
|
India
|
circa 1876
|
|
|
3
|
Ex parte Mirabita, In re Dale
|
[1875] UKLawRpEq 172; 20 Eq 772
|
|
United Kingdom
|
23 Jul 1875
|
CommonLII
|
|
7
|
Peter Der Grosse (6972)
|
[1875] UKLawRpPro 18; (1875) 1 PD 414; (1876) 34 LT 749
|
|
United Kingdom
|
22 Jul 1875
|
CommonLII
|
|
10
|
Re Macleay
|
[1875] UKLawRpEq 85; 20 Eq 186; 23 WR 718; 190 Lat 37
|
|
United Kingdom
|
4 May 1875
|
CommonLII
|
|
24 
|
Nicholson v Nicholson
|
(1874) 29 LT 108
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1874
|
|
|
2
|
Lebeau v General Steam Navigation Co
|
[1872] UKLawRpCP 60; (1872-1873) LR 8 CP 88
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom
|
12 Nov 1872
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
(1871) 3 PC 465
|
(1871) 3 PC 465
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1871
|
|
|
87  
|
R v Wade
|
(1869) 11 Cox CC 549
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1869
|
|
|
6
|
(1860) 5 WR 3
|
(1860) 5 WR 3; 2 Jur NS 1064
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1860
|
|
|
5
|
Lee , Assignees of Peters, a Bankrupt v Hart
|
[1856] EngR 221; 156 ER 1089; (1856) 11 Exch 880
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1856
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
[1855] Dears 555
|
[1855] Dears 555
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1855
|
|
|
7
|
Tinkler v Hilder
|
[1849] EngR 705; 4 Exch 187; (1849) 18 LJEx 429; 154 ER 1176
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1849
|
CommonLII
|
|
19
|
Perry v Truefitt
|
[1842] EngR 1167; 6 Beav 66; 49 ER 749
|
Rolls Court
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1842
|
CommonLII
|
|
38 
|
R v Farler
|
[1839] EngR 218; 173 ER 418; (1839) 8 C & P 106
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1839
|
CommonLII
|
|
15
|
Harding v Stokes
|
[1837] EngR 115; 150 ER 742; (1837) 2 M & W 233
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1837
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
Henderson v Sherborne
|
[1837] EngR 124; 150 ER 743; (1837) 2 M & W 236
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1837
|
CommonLII
|
|
8
|
Baxter v Prichard
|
(1834) 1 A & E 456--3
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Daniel Giles, Esquire, late Sheriff of the County of Herts, v Harry Grover and James Pollard
|
[1832] EngR 61; 9 Bing 128; 131 ER 563; 6 ER 5413; 2 Moo & S 731
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1832
|
CommonLII
|
|
35 
|
Cash v Giles
|
[1828] EngR 472; (1828) 3 C & P 409; 172 ER 477
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1828
|
CommonLII
|
|
8
|
R v Sanderson
|
[1810] EngR 46; 145 ER 1171; [1810-1811] Wight 50
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1810
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
Doe, on the demise of John Gill and Hannah his Wife, v Pearson
|
[1805] EngR 58; 6 East 173; 102 ER 1253
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1805
|
CommonLII
|
|
23 
|
Thomas Muscham Knight, and Marcaret his Wife, and Thomas Lock Esq; and Jane His Wife v Colan Blurt, Michael Sampson, Edward Jenny and Elizabeth His Wife
|
[1659] EngR 184; 123 ER 1253; [1659] JBridg 132
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1659
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
107-60 LJQB 145
|
107-60 LJQB 145
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
964 CRC 1350
|
964 CRC 1350
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
1
|
761 CRC 180
|
761 CRC 180
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
1
|
758 Mad 1
|
758 Mad 1
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
445 CRC 81
|
445 CRC 81
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
2
|
391 CRC 726--134
|
391 CRC 726--134
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
1
|
189a Magistrate 3P
|
189a Magistrate 3P
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
168 IC 1103
|
168 IC 1103
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
166 IC 895
|
166 IC 895
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
166 IC 789; 154 IC 455
|
166 IC 789; 154 IC 455
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
166 IC 258; 156 IC 294; 36 Oudh Law Journal 1046
|
166 IC 258; 156 IC 294; 36 Oudh Law Journal 1046
|
Oudh Law Journal
|
United Kingdom - Uttar Pradesh
|
|
|
|
1
|
164 IC 915
|
164 IC 915; 154 IC 514
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 807
|
159 IC 807
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
159 IC 745
|
159 IC 745
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 687
|
159 IC 687
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 591
|
159 IC 591
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 466
|
159 IC 466
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 296
|
159 IC 296
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
159 IC 188
|
159 IC 188
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 Intl Org 373
|
158 Intl Org 373
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 964
|
158 IC 964; (1307) 158 IC 256
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 942
|
158 IC 942
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 923
|
158 IC 923
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 314
|
158 IC 314
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 282
|
158 IC 282
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 212
|
158 IC 212
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
158 IC 72
|
158 IC 72
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
157 IC 697; 36 Cr LJ 1161
|
157 IC 697; 36 Cr LJ 1161
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
157 IC 28
|
157 IC 28
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 892; 156 IC 223; 36 Cr LJ 869
|
156 IC 892; 156 IC 223; 36 Cr LJ 869
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 722
|
156 IC 722
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
156 IC 702
|
156 IC 702
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 421
|
156 IC 421
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 321
|
156 IC 321
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 247
|
156 IC 247
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
156 IC 154
|
156 IC 154
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
155 IC 1114
|
155 IC 1114
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
155 IC 971
|
155 IC 971; 154 IC 580
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
155 IC 736
|
155 IC 736
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
155 IC 448
|
155 IC 448
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
154 IC 828
|
154 IC 828
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
154 IC 552; 36 Cr LJ 412
|
154 IC 552; 36 Cr LJ 412
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
154 IC 339; 36 Cr LJ 497; 86 Cr LJ 877
|
154 IC 339; 36 Cr LJ 497; 86 Cr LJ 877
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
154 IC 101
|
154 IC 101
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
153 IC 976
|
153 IC 976; 156 IC 383
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
153 IC 651; 36 Cr LJ 831
|
153 IC 651; 36 Cr LJ 831
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
149 IC 1169
|
149 IC 1169
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
146 IC 8
|
146 IC 8
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
112 LT 3kb
|
112 LT 3KB
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
112 IC 318
|
112 IC 318
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
109 IC 237
|
109 IC 237
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
106 IC 100
|
106 IC 100
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
3
|
104 IC 378
|
104 IC 378
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
102 IC 366
|
102 IC 366
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
100 IC 227
|
100 IC 227
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
4
|
97 IC 417
|
97 IC 417
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
94 LT 59
|
94 LT 59
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
86 Cr LJ 1345
|
86 Cr LJ 1345
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
86 Cr LJ 881
|
86 Cr LJ 881
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
86 Cr LJ 869
|
86 Cr LJ 869
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
86 Cr LJ 866; 36 Cr LJ 1464; 168 IC 992
|
86 Cr LJ 866; 36 Cr LJ 1464; 168 IC 992
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
81 LJPC 113
|
81 LJPC 113
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
79 JP 286
|
79 JP 286
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
62 IC 234
|
62 IC 234
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
62 IC 23
|
62 IC 23
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
57 LJQB 580
|
57 LJQB 580
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
56 Cal 865
|
56 Cal 865
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
55 Cal 199
|
55 Cal 199
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
Austin & Whitley Ltd v
|
52 Cal 453
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
51 Mad 967
|
51 Mad 967
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
Travancore National Bank
|
51 Bom 725
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
11
|
50 Mad 839
|
50 Mad 839
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
49 Bom 535
|
49 Bom 535
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
46 Bom 1026
|
46 Bom 1026
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
44 Cal 66
|
44 Cal 66
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
5
|
43 Bom 258
|
43 Bom 258
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
41 Cal 446
|
41 Cal 446
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
40 Cal 297
|
40 Cal 297
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
19
|
40 Cal 192
|
40 Cal 192
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
37 Cr LJ 20
|
37 Cr LJ 20
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Oudh Law Journal 1484
|
36 Oudh Law Journal 1484
|
Oudh Law Journal
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 1480
|
36 Cr LJ 1480
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 1461
|
36 Cr LJ 1461
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 1319
|
36 Cr LJ 1319
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 975
|
36 Cr LJ 975
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 908
|
36 Cr LJ 908
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 889; 36 Cr LJ 902
|
36 Cr LJ 889; 36 Cr LJ 902
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 885
|
36 Cr LJ 885
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 872
|
36 Cr LJ 872
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 865; 86 Cr LJ 827; 36 Cr LJ 1310
|
36 Cr LJ 865; 86 Cr LJ 827; 36 Cr LJ 1310
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 824
|
36 Cr LJ 824
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
Enayet Ali v Emperor
|
36 Cr LJ 698; 36 Cr LJ 571
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
36 Cr LJ 581; 163 IC 635
|
36 Cr LJ 581; 163 IC 635
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 577
|
36 Cr LJ 577
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Cr LJ 5
|
36 Cr LJ 5
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
36 Bom LR 1103
|
36 Bom LR 1103
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
3
|
Ashutosh Sikdar v Behari Lai Kirtania
|
35 Cal 61
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
34 Cr LJ 623
|
34 Cr LJ 623
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
34 Cal 443
|
34 Cal 443
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
33 Public Law Review 1048
|
33 Public Law Review 1048
|
Public Law Review
|
Australia
|
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
33 Own 435
|
33 OWN 435
|
|
Canada - Ontario
|
|
|
|
2
|
Boulton v Boulton
|
33 LJP & M 33
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
33 Cal 1023
|
33 Cal 1023
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
33 Bom LR 520
|
33 Bom LR 520
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
3
|
Clough v County Live Stock Insurance
|
32 TLR 526
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
32 IC 354
|
32 IC 354
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
Nagaruru v Tangatur
|
31 Mad 330
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
30 MLJ 238
|
30 MLJ 238
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
Bhagwandas v Kanji
|
30 Bom 205
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
7
|
29 SLR 236
|
29 SLR 236
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
Krishnan v Ven-katapathy Chetty
|
29 Mad 318
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
Pellew v Pellevv
|
28 LJP & M 44
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
Moholal v Bai Jivkore
|
28 Bom 472; 6 Bom LR 529
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
4
|
27 SLR 451
|
27 SLR 451
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
27 Cr LJ 935
|
27 Cr LJ 935
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
27 Cr LJ 40
|
27 Cr LJ 40
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
27 Bom LR 685
|
27 Bom LR 685
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
26 TLR 539
|
26 TLR 539
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
26 Ch D 11
|
26 Ch D 11
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Ayyar v King Emperor
|
25 Mad 61
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
Malkarjun v Narhari
|
25 Bom 337
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
58 
|
25 Bom 168
|
25 Bom 168
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
6
|
25 Bom 151
|
25 Bom 151
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
5
|
24 SLR 470
|
24 SLR 470
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
M Lucas v Official Assignee of Bengal
|
24 CWN 418
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
24 Cal 589
|
24 Cal 589
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
23 SLR 427
|
23 SLR 427
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
23 SLR 39
|
23 SLR 39
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
22 TLR 85
|
22 TLR 85
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
22 SLR 135
|
22 SLR 135
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
22 Bom LR 951
|
22 Bom LR 951
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
21 SLR 220
|
21 SLR 220
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
3
|
21 Cal 121
|
21 Cal 121
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
21 Bom 250
|
21 Bom 250
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
6
|
20 SLR 128
|
20 SLR 128
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
20 SLR 34
|
20 SLR 34
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
20 Cal 642
|
20 Cal 642
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
20 Cal 612
|
20 Cal 612
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
19 WB 356
|
19 WB 356
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
18 WR 185
|
18 WR 185
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
18 Mad 250
|
18 Mad 250
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
17 SLR 211
|
17 SLR 211
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
17 Bom 573
|
17 Bom 573
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
Kasturchand v Sagarmal
|
17 Bom 413
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
5
|
16 Cal 610
|
16 Cal 610
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
16 Cal 10
|
16 Cal 10
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
Reazuddi v Emperor
|
15 IC 646
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
3
|
15 IC 77
|
15 IC 77
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
15 CWN 66
|
15 CWN 66
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
Sardhari Lai v Ambika Pershad
|
15 Cal 521
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
16
|
15 Cal 455
|
15 Cal 455
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
15 Cal 375
|
15 Cal 375
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
15 Bom LR 13
|
15 Bom LR 13
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
15 AC 267
|
15 AC 267
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
14
|
14 Lah 249
|
14 Lah 249
|
|
Pakistan
|
|
|
|
1
|
14 Cal 721
|
14 Cal 721
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
Re Gibbons
|
14 Cal 42
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
14 Bom LR 212
|
14 Bom LR 212
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
Breckenridge v Drummoyne Municipal Council
|
13 LGR 76
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
5
|
13 Cr LJ 445
|
13 Cr LJ 445
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
12 Moore Ind App 157
|
12 Moore Ind App 157
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
9
|
11 CWN 583
|
11 CWN 583
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
11 Cal 486
|
11 Cal 486
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
11 Bom HCR 120
|
11 Bom HCR 120
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
Lalohand v Narhar
|
11 Bom 551; AIR 1926 Nag 31
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
25 
|
Wahid Ali v Jumajee
|
11 Beng LR 149
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
|
|
|
1
|
10 WR 85
|
10 WR 85
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
9 IC 161
|
9 IC 161
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
9 Guernsey Law Journal 485
|
9 Guernsey Law Journal 485
|
Guernsey Law Journal
|
Guernsey
|
|
|
|
1
|
Holmes v Russel
|
9 Dowl 487
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
7
|
9 CWN 76
|
9 CWN 76
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
8 CLJ 59
|
8 CLJ 59
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
8 Cal 739
|
8 Cal 739
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
3
|
7 SLR 118
|
7 SLR 118
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
7 SLR 42
|
7 SLR 42
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
7 Bom LR 165
|
7 Bom LR 165
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
6 CWN 548
|
6 CWN 548
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
6 CWN 98
|
6 CWN 98
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
6 Act 11
|
6 Act 11
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
3
|
6 Act 8
|
6 Act 8
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
4
|
5 SLR 29
|
5 SLR 29
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
5 CWN 158
|
5 CWN 158
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
5 Ch 50
|
5 Ch 50
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
5 Bom LR 980
|
5 Bom LR 980
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
3
|
5 Act 4
|
5 Act 4
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
4 Bom 101
|
4 Bom 101
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
3 SLR 167
|
3 SLR 167
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
3 SLR 5
|
3 SLR 5
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
3 Cal 688
|
3 Cal 688
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
2g Bom 298
|
2G Bom 298
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
2
|
2 QB 460
|
2 QB 460
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
12
|
2 QB 300
|
2 QB 300
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
4
|
2 P 230
|
2 P 230
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
2 P 228
|
2 P 228
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
2 P 227
|
2 P 227
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
2 P 220
|
2 P 220
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Howard v Bodington
|
2 P 211
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
2 P 205
|
2 P 205
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
2 P 197
|
2 P 197
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
2 P 128
|
2 P 128
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
2 P 57
|
2 P 57
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
2 P 50
|
2 P 50
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 
|
2 P 48
|
2 P 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
2 P 21
|
2 P 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
2 Ch 684
|
2 Ch 684
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
5
|
2 AC 11
|
2 AC 11
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
3
|
1 QB 408
|
1 QB 408
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
6
|
Howel v George
|
1 Mad 6
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
3
|
1 Ch 19
|
1 Ch 19
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
14
|
Lahore High Court, Vol
|
1 Ch 1-B
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
3
|
1 Ch 1
|
1 Ch 1
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
89  
|
Rose v Haycock
|
1 A & E 460
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
7
|
Baxter v Prilchard
|
1 A & E 456
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
14
|