F W Woolworth Co v Contemporary Arts, Inc
|
344 US 228; 97 L Ed 276; 73 SCt 222
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
22 Dec 1952
|
WorldLII
|
|
58 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Woolworth Co v Contemporary Arts
|
193 F2d 162
|
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
|
United States
|
26 Dec 1951
|
WorldLII
|
|
12
|
Alfred Bell & Co v Catalda Fine Arts, Inc
|
191 F2d 99; 90 USPQ 153
|
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
|
United States
|
20 Jul 1951
|
WorldLII
|
|
90 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Stein v Expert Lamp Co
|
188 F2d 611; 89 USPQ 416
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
22 May 1951
|
WorldLII
|
|
6
|
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v South Texas Lumber Co
|
333 US 496; 92 L Ed 831; 68 SCt 695
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
3 May 1948
|
WorldLII
|
|
223 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
"Copyright Law,"
|
[1948] Annual Survey of American Law 777
|
Annual Survey of American Law
|
United States
|
circa 1948
|
HeinOnline / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Merchants National Bank of Boston v Commissioner
|
320 US 256; 88 L Ed 35; 64 SCt 108
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
15 Nov 1943
|
WorldLII
|
|
67 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Morton Salt Co v G S Suppiger Co
|
315 US 788; 314 US 488; 52 USPQ 30; 86 L Ed 363; 62 SCt 402
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
2 Feb 1942
|
WorldLII
|
|
121 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Textile Mills Securities Corporation v Commissioner
|
314 US 326; 86 L Ed 249; 62 SCt 272
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
8 Dec 1941
|
WorldLII
|
|
53 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co
|
188 US 239; 47 L Ed 460; 23 SCt 298
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
2 Feb 1903
|
WorldLII
|
|
78 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co v Sarony
|
111 US 53; 28 L Ed 349; 4 SCt 279
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
17 Mar 1884
|
WorldLII
|
|
68 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Baker v Selden
|
101 US 99; 11 Ot 99; 25 L Ed 841
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
1 Oct 1879
|
WorldLII
|
|
108 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
342 US 829
|
342 US 829; 96 L Ed 627; 72 SCt 53; 96 L Ed 2d 627
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
29 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
King Features Syndicate v Fleischer
|
299 F 533
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
E I Hortman & Aetna Doll Co v Kaufman
|
286 F 372
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
261 US 615
|
261 US 615; 67 L Ed 828; 43 SCt 361; (1923) 4 Benedict Admiralty 554
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
8
|
Hill v Whalen & Martell, Inc
|
220 F 359
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Ricker v General Electric Co
|
162 F2d 141
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
5
|
Stein v Benaderet, D C
|
109 FSupp 364
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
5
|
Stein v Rosenthal, DC
|
103 FSupp 227
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
Stein v Expert Lamp Co , D C
|
96 FSupp 97
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
Arnstein v Edward B Marks Music Corporation
|
82 F2d 275
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
12
|
Sheldon v Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation
|
81 F2d 49
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
53 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Fleischer Studios, Inc v Ralph A Freundlich, Inc
|
73 F2d 276
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
12
|
"The argument that useful articles purporting to be works of art should be excluded from copyright because they may qualify for a design patent is not convincing "
|
66 Harvard Law Review 882
|
Harvard Law Review
|
United States
|
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
27 Indiana Law Journal 131
|
27 Indiana Law Journal 131
|
Indiana Law Journal
|
United States
|
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
27 Indiana Law Journal 130
|
27 Indiana Law Journal 130
|
Indiana Law Journal
|
United States
|
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
Gerlach-Barklow Co v Morris & Bendien, Inc
|
23 F2d 159
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
14
|
21 George Washington Law Review 359
|
21 George Washington Law Review 359
|
George Washington Law Review
|
United States
|
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
Jones Bros Co v Underkoffler, D C
|
16 FSupp 729
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
Pellegrini v Allegrini, DC
|
2 F2d 610
|
|
United States
|
|
Westlaw
|
|
6
|