Mr Sen: "The decision in a judgment of the Supreme Court cannot be assailed on the ground that certain aspects were not considered or the relevant provisions were not brought to the notice of the Court (See
|
AIR 1970 SC 1002
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1970
|
|
|
14
|
Dhulabhai v Madhya Pradesh & Anr
|
[1968] INSC 93; [1968] 3 SCR 662; AIR 1969 SC 78
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
5 Apr 1968
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
90  
|
Kamala Mills Ltd v Bombay
|
[1965] INSC 120; [1966] 1 SCR 64; AIR 1965 SC 1942
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
23 Apr 1965
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
16
|
Bharat Kala Bhandar Ltd v Municipal Committee, Dhamangaon
|
[1965] INSC 81; [1965] 3 SCR 499; AIR 1966 SC 249
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
26 Mar 1965
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
14
|
Firm and Illuri Subbayya Chetty and Sons v Andhra Pradesh
|
[1963] INSC 16; [1964] 1 SCR 752; AIR 1964 SC 322
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
25 Jan 1963
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
18
|
Bengal Immunity Co Ltd v Bihar
|
[1955] 2 SCR 603; [1955] SC 661
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1955
|
|
|
114  
|
Neville v London Express Newspaper Ltd
|
[1919] AC 368
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1919
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
84  
|
Wolverhampton new Waterworks Co v Hawkesford
|
[1859] EngR 510; 6 CBNS 336; (1859) 28 LJCP 242
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1859
|
CommonLII
|
|
82  
|
Secretary of State v Mask & Co
|
67 IR 222
|
|
|
circa 1970
|
|
|
1
|
2 SCR 273
|
2 SCR 273
|
|
|
circa 1970
|
|
|
1
|