Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
|
[1999] FCA 1020; [1999] FCAFC 1020; (1999) 93 FCR 365; (1999) 367 ALR 393; (1999) 45 IPR 411; [1999] AIPC 91-499
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
29 Jul 1999
|
AustLII
|
|
1343 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
American Tobacco Co, Re
|
[1996] ATMO 29; 35 IPR 98
|
IP Australia - Australian Trade Marks Office
|
Australia
|
21 May 1996
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
Pioneer Hi-Bred Corn Co v Hy-Line Chicks Pty Ltd
|
[1978] 2 NZLR 50; [1979] RPC 410
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1979
|
LexisNexis
|
|
936 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
(1954) 91 CLR 592
|
(1954) 91 CLR 592
|
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 1954
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
1542 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Arthur Fairest Ltd's Application
|
(1951) 68 RPC 197
|
|
|
circa 1951
|
|
|
36 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Jellinek ’ s Application
|
(1946) 63 RPC 59; (1946) 1A IPR 393
|
|
|
circa 1946
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
521 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd
|
[1937] HCA 51; (1937) 58 CLR 641; (1937) 11 ALJR 186
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
2 Sep 1937
|
AustLII
|
|
1245 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Jafferjee v Scarlett
|
[1937] HCA 36; (1937) 57 CLR 115; [1937] ALR 404; (1937) 11 ALJR 146
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
30 Jul 1937
|
AustLII
|
|
281 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
W & G du Cros Ltd ’ s Application
|
(1913) 30 RPC 660; [1913] AC 624
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
274 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Re Hicks ’ Trade Mark
|
[1897] VicLawRp 118; (1897) 22 VLR 636; 18 ALT 229; 3 ALR 75
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
17 Nov 1897
|
AustLII
|
|
591 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
29 RPC 74
|
29 RPC 74
|
|
|
circa 1913
|
|
|
2
|
American Express Co v NV Amev
|
5 IPR 267
|
|
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
3
|