LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Spam: An Examination of Private and Legislative Responses to Unsolicited Electronic Mail in Australia and the United States    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Grosse v Purvis	[2003] QDC 151; [2003] Aust Torts Reports 81-706	District Court of Queensland	Australia - Queensland	16 Jun 2003	AustLII		64
"Cookies and spam"	(2003) 153 (7071) New Law Journal 379	New Law Journal	United Kingdom	circa 2003	LexisNexis		1
"Spam-related class actions are on the horizon: and the US government could end up as a defendant"	(2003) 172 New Jersey Law Journal 20	New Jersey Law Journal	United States - New Jersey	circa 2003			1
"Do not advertise: the current fight against unsolicited advertisements"	[2003] Duke Law and Technology Review 10	Duke Law and Technology Review	United States	circa 2003	LexisNexis		1
"Can spam be stopped? Rather than legislate a quick fix, Congress needs to look harder at legal and technical complexities"	[2003] Legal Times 26	Legal Times	United Kingdom	circa 2003			1
Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick	[2002] HCA 56	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	10 Dec 2002	AustLII		184
Accc v Chen	[2002] FCA 1248	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	8 Oct 2002	AustLII		1
"Canning the spam"	(2002) 24 American Lawyer 31	American Lawyer	United States	circa 2002	HeinOnline		1
"Tired of spam? There are steps you can take to fight it"	(2002) 25 (49) Legal Times 28	Legal Times	United Kingdom	circa 2002			1
"Raising the E-drawbridge on Cybertrespass"	(2002) 228 New York Law Journal 5	New York Law Journal	United States - New York	circa 2002			1
"Spam scammers hit a new low with spoofed e-mail"	(2002) 228 New York Law Journal 56	New York Law Journal	United States - New York	circa 2002			1
"Court enjoins bait-and-switch spam scam"	(2002) 227 New York Law Journal 5	New York Law Journal	United States - New York	circa 2002			1
"Benefits and Costs of Online Privacy Legislation, The"	(2002) 54 Administrative Law Review 85	Administrative Law Review	United States	circa 2002	HeinOnline		2
"The indecency of unsolicited sexually explicit emails: a comment on the protection of free speech v the protection of children"	(2002) 26 Seattle University Law Review 125	Seattle University Law Review	United States	circa 2002	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"New rules for inboxes"	(2002) 146 (36) Solicitors Journal 857	Solicitor's Journal	United Kingdom	circa 2002			1
"The politics of spam: yet another way to annoy voters"	(2002) 25 (38) Legal Times 21	Legal Times	United Kingdom	circa 2002			1
(2002) 170 New Jersey Law Journal 30	(2002) 170 New Jersey Law Journal 30	New Jersey Law Journal	United States - New Jersey	circa 2002			1
(2001) 24 (21) Legal Times 51	(2001) 24 (21) Legal Times 51	Legal Times	United Kingdom	circa 2001			1
"Technical and legal approaches to unsolicited electronic mail"	[2001] University of San Francisco Law Review 35	University of San Francisco Law Review	United States - California	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"The slippery fight over e-mail spam: bills aim to slash junk mail while protecting e-commerce"	(2001) 24 (19) Legal Times 1	Legal Times	United Kingdom	circa 2001			1
"Two bills seek to provide protection against e-mail spam"	(2001) 225 New York Law Journal 5	New York Law Journal	United States - New York	circa 2001			1
"Spam: remedies against the crime not the ham"	[2001] Keeping Good Companies 53	Keeping Good Companies		circa 2001			1
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd	[2001] HCA 63; (2001) 208 CLR 199; (2001) 185 ALR 1; (2001) 54 IPR 161; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-627; (2001) 76 ALJR 1; (2001) 22 Leg Rep 11	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	circa 2001	AustLII		1176
"Spam remedies"	(2001) 27 William Mitchell Law Review 1649	William Mitchell Law Review	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"E-mail blocking: spammers (and alleged spammers) fight back"	(2001) 226 New York Law Journal 3	New York Law Journal	United States - New York	circa 2001			1
"The right to spam? Regulating electronic junk mail"	(2000) 23 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 363	Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts	United States	circa 2000	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"The postman always rings 4,000 times: new approaches to curb spam"	(2000) 18 John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law 915	John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law	United States	circa 2000	Westlaw		1
Macquarie Bank v Berg	[1999] NSWSC 526	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	2 Jun 1999	AustLII		17
Arnott's Ltd v Bourke Atwell v Truline (Aust) Pty Ltd Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Internic Technology Pty Ltd	42 IPR 225; [1998] ATPR 41-646		Australia	circa 1998	LexisNexis AU		8
Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor	[1937] HCA 45; (1937) 58 CLR 479; [1937] ALR 597	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	26 Aug 1937	AustLII		249
CompuServe Inc v Cyber Promotions	962 FSupp 1015		United States	circa 1998	Westlaw		14
52 University of New South Wales Law Journal 1	52 University of New South Wales Law Journal 1	University of New South Wales Law Journal	Australia	circa 1998	HeinOnline		1
47 Uspq 2d	47 USPQ 2D		United States				1
Intel Corporation v Hamidi	30 Cal4th 1342		United States - California	circa 1998			2
CompuServe Inc v Cyber Promotions Inc	24 FSupp 2d 548		United States	circa 1998	Westlaw		4