LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Federal Circuit Holds That Expressed Sequence Tags Lack Substantial and Specific Utility Unless Underlying Gene Function is Identified    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
In re Fisher	421 F3d 1365	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	7 Sep 2005	WorldLII
"Biotechnology, Technology Policy, and Patentability: Natural Products and Invention in the American System"	(2001) 50 Emory Law Journal 101	Emory Law Journal	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"Owning Genes: Disputes Involving Dna Sequence Patents"	(1999) 75 Chicago-Kent Law Review 231	Chicago-Kent Law Review	United States	circa 1999	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co	119 F3d 1559; 43 USPQ2d 1398	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	24 Oct 1997	WorldLII
Brenner v Manson	383 US 519; 148 USPQ 689; 16 L Ed 2d 69; 86 SCt 1033	United States Supreme Court	United States	21 Mar 1966	WorldLII
[1380] Idaho 51	[1380] Idaho 51		United States - Idaho	circa 1380
In re Kirk	376 F2d 936; 54 CCPA 1119; 153 USPQ 48		United States	circa 2001	Westlaw
58 Fisher 421	58 Fisher 421		United States	circa 2001
39 Fisher 421	39 Fisher 421		United States	circa 2001
22 Fisher 421	22 Fisher 421		United States	circa 2001
21 Fisher 421	21 Fisher 421		United States	circa 2001
"The Evolving Application of the Written Description Requirement to Biotechnological Inventions"	13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 615	Berkeley Technology Law Journal	United States		HeinOnline / LexisNexis
10 Fisher 421	10 Fisher 421		United States
DNA Is Different: Legal Obviousness and the Balance Between Biotech Inventors and the Market	9 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 53	Harvard Journal of Law & Technology	United States		HeinOnline / LexisNexis