LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
(2007) 1205 PM 50 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
United States v Begay | 470 F3d 964 | United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit | United States | 12 Dec 2006 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
United States v McCall | 439 F3d 967 | United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit | United States | 15 Mar 2006 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
New Rule of Lenity | 119 Harvard Law Review 2420 | Harvard Law Review | United States | 1 Jan 2006 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
United States v James | 430 F3d 1150 | United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit | United States | 17 Nov 2005 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() |
United States v Johnson | 417 F3d 990 | United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit | United States | 17 Aug 2005 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Shepard v United States |
544 US 13; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 7 Mar 2005 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
United States v Bryant | 310 F3d 550 | United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit | United States | 13 Nov 2002 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
"The Sentencing Rule of Lenity" | (2002) 33 University of Toledo Law Review 511 | University of Toledo Law Review | United States | circa 2002 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
Apprendi v New Jersey |
530 US 466; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 26 Jun 2000 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
United States v Springfield | 196 F3d 1180 | United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit | United States | 17 Nov 1999 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
United States v Lanier |
520 US 259; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 31 Mar 1997 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dan M Kahan, Lenity and Federal Common Law Crimes |
|
Supreme Court Review | United States | circa 1994 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Smith v United States |
508 US 223; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 9 Aug 1993 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
United States v RLC |
503 US 291; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 24 Mar 1992 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Quasi Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking" |
|
Vanderbilt Law Review | United States | circa 1992 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Chapman v United States |
500 US 453; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 2 Aug 1991 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Taylor v United States |
495 US 575; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 29 May 1990 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mistretta v United States |
488 US 361; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 18 Jan 1989 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ford Motor Co v EEOC |
458 US 219; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 28 Jun 1982 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Albernaz v United States |
450 US 333; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 9 Mar 1981 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories" |
|
Yale Law Journal | United States | circa 1980 | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huddleston v United States |
415 US 814; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 26 Mar 1974 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
United States v Bass |
404 US 336; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 20 Dec 1971 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
McBoyle v United States |
283 US 25; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 9 Mar 1931 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Osborn v Bank of the United States |
22 US 738; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 13 Feb 1812 | WorldLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(1590) 13 James 430 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1590 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Jones v State |
|
United States | circa 1980 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
James v United States |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1980 | Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Staples v United States |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1980 | Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Musladin v Lamarque |
|
United States | circa 1980 | Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
|
"Public Values In Statutory Interpretation" | 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1007 | University of Pennsylvania Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Rita v United States |
|
United States | Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
James v United States |
|
United States | Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
||
"Federalism And The Politics Of Sentencing" |
|
Columbia Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Preference-Eliciting Statutory Default Rules" |
|
Columbia Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions" |
|
Yale Law Journal | United States | HeinOnline / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Originalism and Formalism in Criminal Procedure: The Triumph of Justice Scalia, the Unlikely Friend of Criminal Defendants?" |
|
Georgetown Law Journal | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"The Rule Of Lenity As A Rule Of Structure" |
|
Fordham Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes" |
|
Virginia Law Review | United States | LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Nondelegation Canons" | 67 University of Chicago Law Review 315 | University of Chicago Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Statutes' Domains" | 50 University of Chicago Law Review 533 | University of Chicago Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
47 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
42 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
40 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
38 Idaho 28 |
|
United States - Idaho |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Justices Stevens and Ginsburg |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
35 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
32 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Sarah Newland, Note, The Mercy of Scalia: Statutory Construction and the Rule of Lenity | 29 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 197 | Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review | United States | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Souter, and Breyer |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
13 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
12 James 127 |
|
United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |