Commerce Commission v Woolworths Ltd
|
[2008] NZCA 276; (2008) 8 NZBLC 102,336; [2009] NZCCLR 12; (2008) 12 TCLR 194
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
1 Aug 2008
|
NZLII
|
|
118 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
New Zealand Bus Ltd v Commerce Commission
|
[2007] NZCA 502; [2008] 3 NZLR 433; (2008) 12 TCLR 69
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
6 Jun 2008
|
NZLII
|
|
46 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Woolworths v Commerce Commission
|
[2007] NZHC 1351; [2008] NZCCLR 10; (2008) 8 NZBLC 102,128
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
29 Nov 2007
|
NZLII
|
|
103 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Commerce Commission v New Zealand Bus Ltd HC Auckland CIV 2007-404
|
[2006] NZHC 736; (2006) 3 NZCCLR 111; (2006) 11 TCLR 679; (2006) 8 NZBLC 101,774
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
29 Jun 2006
|
NZLII
|
|
32 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Air New Zealand v Commerce Commission (No 6)
|
[2004] NZHC 1010; (2004) 11 TCLR 347
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
17 Sep 2004
|
NZLII
|
|
62 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Brambles v Commerce Commission
|
(2003) 10 TCLR 868
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
72 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Federal Trade Commission, Appellant v HJ Heinz Co and Milnot Holding Corporation, Appellees
|
246 F3d 708
|
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
|
United States
|
27 Apr 2001
|
WorldLII
|
|
7
|
Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority
|
[2000] FCA 38; [2000] ATPR 41-752
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
28 Jan 2000
|
AustLII
|
|
29 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
" the Failing Co Defence in New Zealand"
|
(2000) 19 New Zealand Universities Law Review 58
|
New Zealand Universities Law Review
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2000
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Port Nelson Ltd v Commerce Commission
|
[1996] NZCA 230; [1996] 3 NZLR 554; (1996) 5 NZBLC 99,382; (1996) 7 TCLR 217
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
3 Jul 1996
|
NZLII
|
|
173 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Commerce Commission v Port Nelson Ltd
|
[1995] NZHC 1130; (1995) 6 TCLR 406; (1995) 5 NZBLC 103,762
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
2 Jun 1995
|
NZLII
|
|
119 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd v Commerce Commission
|
[1992] NZCA 595; [1992] 3 NZLR 429; (1992) 4 TCLR 648; (1992) 4 NZBLC 102,724
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
23 Jun 1992
|
NZLII
|
|
55 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
New Zealand Co-operative Dairy Co Ltd v Commerce Commission
|
[1992] 1 NZLR 601
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1992
|
LexisNexis
|
|
24 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd v Commerce Commission
|
[1991] NZHC 3161; (1991) 4 TCLR 473; [1992] NZAR 193; (1991) 3 NZBLC 102,340
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
10 Dec 1991
|
NZLII
|
|
137 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
"The Efficiency of Chapter 11"
|
(1991) 8 Bankruptcy Developments Journal 319
|
Bankruptcy Developments Journal
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
HeinOnline
|
|
2
|
"The Welfare Basis of the `Failing Co' Doctrine"
|
(1985) 30 Antitrust Bulletin 357
|
Antitrust Bulletin
|
United States
|
circa 1985
|
|
|
1
|
Citizen Publishing Co v United States
|
394 US 131; 22 L Ed 2d 148; 89 SCt 927
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
10 Mar 1969
|
WorldLII
|
|
45 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Mahnich v Southern SS Co
|
321 US 96; [1944] AMC 1; 88 L Ed 561; 64 SCt 455
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
31 Jan 1944
|
WorldLII
|
|
231 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
International Shoe Co v FTC
|
280 US 291; 74 L Ed 431; 50 SCt 89
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
6 Jan 1930
|
WorldLII
|
|
54 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Chicago Board of Trade v United States
|
246 US 231; 62 L Ed 683; 38 SCt 242
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
4 Mar 1918
|
WorldLII
|
|
250 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
United States v MPM, Inc
|
397 FSupp 78
|
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
369 US 654
|
369 US 654
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
Westlaw
|
|
666 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
FTC v Arch Coal
|
329 FSupp 2d 109
|
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
United States v Pabst Brewing Co
|
296 FSupp 994
|
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
United States v Diebold Inc
|
197 FSupp 902
|
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
"Market Power in Antitrust Cases"
|
94 Harvard Law Review 937
|
Harvard Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
22 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|
Re Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd
|
25 FCR 169; (1976) 8 ALR 481; (1976) 25 FLR 169; [1976] ATPR 40-012; 1 TPC 109
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia
|
circa 1991
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
261 ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif) ![](/LawCite/images/star.gif)
|