|
Bal Krishan and Anr v Bhagwan Das (Dead) By LRs
|
(2008) 12 SCC 145
|
|
|
circa 2008
|
|
|
 4
|
|
Peter Jebaraj and Anr
|
(2008) 12 SCC 316
|
|
|
circa 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
Vishwa Nath Sharma v Shyam Shanker Goela
|
(2007) 10 SCC 595
|
|
|
circa 2007
|
|
|
7
|
|
Air 2007 SC 637
|
AIR 2007 SC 637
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
Kasturi v Iyyamperumal
|
(2005) 6 SCC 733
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
22 
|
|
Lrs Vs Peruman Gramani
|
(2005) 11 SCC 454
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
1
|
|
Banarsi v Ram Phal
|
(2003) 9 SCC 606
|
|
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
7
|
|
(2002) 5 SCC 383
|
(2002) 5 SCC 383
|
|
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
10
|
|
Baban Bhanudas Kamble
|
AIR 2002 Bom 279
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
1
|
|
Advent Corporation (P) Ltd
|
(2002) 8 SCC 146
|
|
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
1
|
|
Superintending Engineer v B Subba Reddy
|
(1999) 4 SCC 423
|
|
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
4
|
|
Lourdu Mari David v Louis Chinnaya Arogiaswamy
|
(1996) 5 SCC 589
|
|
|
circa 1996
|
|
|
8
|
|
Dr R Jagan Mohan Rao JT
|
1995 5 SC 533
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
1
|
|
High Court: "12 Having heard the parties at length, it is necessary to note that in order to decide the question relating to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court, what is required to be seen is the allegations made, and relief claimed in the plaint The allegations made in the plaint, if perused, it will be clear that the suit in question is nothing but a suit seeking substantive relief of specific performance of contract The declaration of the invalidity of the sale deed in RFA No 44/1986 Page 55 of 72 favour of the subsequent transferees i e , the relief against defendant Nos 6, 13 and 14 is nothing but an ancillary relief If the plaintiff is able to establish his case of the specific performance against the defendant No 1 (respondent No 1) then it would be enough, if the defendant Nos 6, 13 and 14 are joined as parties, to the suit because the only decree to be passed in the suit for specific performance against the subsequent transferees would be to ask them to join in conveyance with the defendant No 1 owner In that sense, it was not necessary at all for the plaintiff to ask for any such declaration as he did It would have been enough for the plaintiff to have joined them as co-defendants so as to contend that the subsequent sale deeds were not binding on him The argument of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the relief of declaration prayed for against the defendant Nos 6, 13 and 14 was required to be valued in terms of money has, therefore, to be rejected 13 The above legal position is no more res integra and is laid down in Vimala Ammal v C Suseela
|
AIR 1991 Mad 209
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
3
|
|
Mritunjoy Sett
|
AIR 1986 Cal 416
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1986
|
|
|
1
|
|
Dwarka Prasad Singh v Harikant Prasad Singh
|
[1972] INSC 287; (1973) 1 SCC 179; [1973] 2 SCR 1064; AIR 1973 SC 655
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
29 Nov 1972
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
9
|
|
Mahabir Prasad v Jage Ram
|
[1971] INSC 3; [1971] 1 SCC 265; [1971] 3 SCR 301; AIR 1971 SC 742
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
6 Jan 1971
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
13
|
|
Javer Chand v Pukhraj Surana
|
[1961] INSC 186; (1962) 2 SCR 333; AIR 1961 SC 1655
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
25 Apr 1961
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
10
|
|
Lala Durga Prasad & Anr v Lala Deep Chand
|
[1953] INSC 71; [1954] SCR 360; AIR 1954 SC 75
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
18 Nov 1953
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
18
|
|
Kali Charan v Janak Deo'
|
AIR 1932 All 694
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1932
|
|
|
3
|
|
Air 1931 Cal 67
|
AIR 1931 Cal 67
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
4
|
|
Potter v Sanders
|
[1846] EngR 1005; 6 Hare 1; 67 ER 1057
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1846
|
CommonLII
|
|
16
|
|
Tasker v Small
|
[1834] EngR 924; 40 ER 848; 5 LJCh 341
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
CommonLII
|
|
12
|
|
Tasker v Small
|
(1834) 40 EngR 848
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
Shri Deewan Arora Vs Smt Tara Devi Sen
|
163 DLT 520
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
3
|
|
SK Gupta Vs Avtar Singh Bedi
|
122 DLT 437
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
2
|
|
28 DLT 272
|
28 DLT 272
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
1
|
|
3 Icc 832
|
3 ICC 832
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2 Ch 164
|
2 Ch 164
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
17
|
