Visnic v Sywak
|
[2009] NSWCA 173; (2009) 257 ALR 517
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
1 Jul 2009
|
AustLII
|
|
13
|
Visnic v Sywak
|
[2008] NSWSC 427; 2 BFRA 620
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
31 Mar 2008
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
Visnic v Sywak
|
[2007] NSWSC 701
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
3 Jul 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
|
[2006] HCA 27; (2006) 226 CLR 256; (2006) 227 ALR 425; (2006) 80 ALJR 1100; (2006) 45 MVR 288; [2006] Aust Torts Reports 81-849
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
14 Jun 2006
|
AustLII
|
|
1199 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd
|
[1992] FCA 272; (1992) 36 FCR 406; (1992) 108 ALR 335
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
9 Jun 1992
|
AustLII
|
|
176 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2)
|
[1982] Ch 204; [1982] 1 All ER 354; [1982] 2 WLR 31
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1982
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
401 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police
|
[1981] UKHL 13; [1982] AC 529; [1981] 3 All ER 727; [1981] 3 WLR 906; 536 ER 727
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Nov 1981
|
BAILII
|
|
1399 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd
|
[1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589; (1981) 36 ALR 3; (1981) 55 ALJR 621
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
1 Sep 1981
|
AustLII
|
|
2542 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Ramsay v Pigram
|
[1968] HCA 34; (1968) 118 CLR 271; [1968] ALR 419; 42 ALJR 89
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
14 Jun 1968
|
AustLII
|
|
352 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2)
|
[1967] 1 AC 853
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1967
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
610 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Reichel v Magrath
|
[1889] UKLawRpAC 20; (1889) 14 AC 665
|
|
United Kingdom
|
4 Jun 1889
|
CommonLII
|
|
409 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Brunsden v Humphrey
|
[1884] UKLawRpKQB 158; 53 LJQB 476; 32 WR 944; (1884-1885) 14 QBD 141
|
|
United Kingdom
|
12 Jul 1884
|
CommonLII
|
|
160 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|