LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"Taking Self-Represented Litigants Seriously"   flag 

(2010) 2 New Zealand Law Students Journal 353
Fotherby, William
New Zealand Law Students' Journal
New Zealand

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Conveyancers Act (Vic)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Bradbury v Westpac Banking Corporation [2009] NZCA 234; [2009] 3 NZLR 400; (2009) 19 PRNZ 385 Court of Appeal of New Zealand New Zealand 8 Jun 2009 NZLII flag
Birkenfeld v Yachting New Zealand Inc [2008] NZCA 531; [2009] 1 NZLR 499 Court of Appeal of New Zealand New Zealand 4 Dec 2008 NZLII flag
1465778 Ontario Inc v 1122077 Ontario Ltd (2006) 275 DLR (4th) 321 Canada circa 2006 flag
Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd [2005] NSWCA 26 Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal Australia - New South Wales 9 Feb 2005 AustLII flag
"Can Courts Cope With Self-Represented Litigants? Visiting Judicial Fellow Public Lecture, September 2003" (2005) 8 Flinders Journal of Law Reform 139 Flinders Journal of Law Reform Australia circa 2005 AustLII flag
"The Pro Se Phenomenon" (2005) 19 BYU Journal of Public Law 373 BYU Journal of Public Law United States circa 2005 HeinOnline / Westlaw flag
Bhamjee v Forsdick (No 2) [2003] EWCA Civ 1113; [2004] 1 WLR 88; [2003] All ER (D) 429 England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division United Kingdom - England and Wales 25 Jul 2003 BAILII flag
British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v Okanagan Indian Band [2003] SCC 71; [2003] 3 SCR 371; 313 NR 84; [2003] SCJ No 76 Supreme Court of Canada Canada circa 2003 flag
Re F: Litigants in Person Guidelines [2001] FamCA 348; [2001] FLC 93-072; (2001) 161 FLR 189; (2001) 27 Fam LR 517 Family Court of Australia Australia 4 Jun 2001 AustLII flag
Coleman v Pateman Farms Ltd [2001] MBCA 75; 156 Man R (2d) 144 Court of Appeal of Manitoba Canada - Manitoba circa 2001 CanLII flag
Prakash v Auckland District Law Society [2000] NZAR 667 New Zealand circa 2000 flag
Fong v Chan (1999) 181 DLR (4th) 614 Canada circa 1999 flag
"Why Should Poor People Get Free Lawyers?" 28 (1998) Victoria University of Wellingtion Law Review 65 Victoria University of Wellingtion Law Review New Zealand circa 1998 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag
"Working with Pro Se Litigants: The Minnesota Experience" (1998) 24 William Mitchell Law Review 297 William Mitchell Law Review United States circa 1998 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag
Johnson v Johnson [1997] FamCA 32; [1997] FLC 92-764; (1997) 139 FLR 384; (1997) 22 Fam LR 141 Family Court of Australia Australia 7 Jul 1997 AustLII flag
Parsonage Hill Wine Co Ltd v Laurenson [1997] DCR (NSW) 940 Australia - New South Wales circa 1997 flag
Environment Protection Authority v Taylor Woodrow (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) (1997) 97 LGERA 368 Australia circa 1997 Legal Online / Westlaw flag
Re Inspirational Homes Ltd [1997] 3 NZLR 438 New Zealand circa 1997 LexisNexis flag
Automatic Parking Coupons Ltd v Time Ticket International Ltd HC Christchurch CP181/96 [1996] NZHC 2243; (1996) 10 PRNZ 538 High Court of New Zealand New Zealand 18 Dec 1996 NZLII flag
Re Collier (A Bankrupt) [1996] NZCA 481; [1996] 2 NZLR 438; (1996) 10 PRNZ 145 Court of Appeal of New Zealand New Zealand 20 Mar 1996 NZLII flag
Skidmore v Blackmore (1995) 122 DLR (4th) 330 Canada circa 1995 flag
Connors v Connors (1995) 177 AR 100 circa 1995
Cachia v Hanes [1994] HCA 14; (1994) 179 CLR 403; (1994) 120 ALR 385; (1994) 68 ALJR 374 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth circa 1994 AustLII flag
Jagwar Holdings Ltd v Julian (1992) 6 PRNZ 496 New Zealand circa 1992 flag
Cachia v Hanes (1991) 23 NSWLR 304 Australia - New South Wales circa 1991 LexisNexis AU flag
R v Hardy (1990) 111 AR 377 circa 1990
"And Justice for All - Including the Unrepresented Poor: Revisiting the Roles of the Judges, Mediators, and Clerks" (1997) 67 Fordham Law Review 1987 Fordham Law Review United States circa 1987 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag
Davies v Eli Lilly & Co [1987] 1 All ER 801; [1987] 1 WLR 428 United Kingdom circa 1987 LexisNexis flag
Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Australia - New South Wales circa 1986 LexisNexis AU flag
Re G J Mannix Ltd [1984] NZCA 162; [1984] 1 NZLR 309; (1984) 2 NZCLC 99,095 Court of Appeal of New Zealand New Zealand 18 Apr 1984 NZLII flag
Hughes v Rowe 449 US 5; 66 L Ed 2d 163; 101 SCt 173 United States Supreme Court United States 10 Nov 1980 WorldLII flag
Daemar v Gilliand [1979] 2 NZLR 7 New Zealand circa 1979 LexisNexis flag
Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1973] EWCA Civ J0216-2; [1974] AC 233; [1974] AC 273; [1973] 3 All ER 54; [1973] 3 WLR 298 England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division United Kingdom - England and Wales circa 1973 BAILII flag
Buckland v Watts [1970] 1 QB 27 United Kingdom circa 1970 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag
Lysnar v National Bank of New Zealand Ltd NZCA [1935] NZGazLawRp 81; [1935] NZLR 557; (1935) 35 GLR 511 New Zealand Gazette Law Reports New Zealand 12 Jul 1935 NZLII flag
H Tolputt & Co Ltd v Mole [1910] UKLawRpKQB 176; (1911) 1 KB 87 United Kingdom 26 Nov 1910 CommonLII flag
London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley [1884] UKLawRpKQB 115; (1884) 13 QBD 872 Queen's Bench United Kingdom 30 May 1884 CommonLII flag
Cashin v Cradock [1876] UKLawRpCh 272; (1876) 3 Ch D 376 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 26 Jul 1876 CommonLII flag
Harold v Smith [1860] EngR 516; (1860) 5 H & N 381; 29 LJEx 141; 157 ER 1229 Court of Exchequer United Kingdom circa 1860 CommonLII flag
Child and Family Services) v AJ 247 DLR (4th) 490 Canada circa 1987 flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback