Szatv v MIAC
|
[2007] HCA 40; (2007) 233 CLR 18; (2007) 237 ALR 634; (2007) 81 ALJR 1659; (2007) 97 ALD 1; [2007] ALMD 6400
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
2164 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
MIMA v Respondents S152/2003
|
[2004] HCA 18; (2004) 222 CLR 1; (2004) 205 ALR 487; (2004) 78 ALJR 678; (2004) 77 ALD 296
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
21 Apr 2004
|
AustLII
|
|
2284 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
[2003] Sec 5
|
[2003] SEC 5
|
|
United States
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
2
|
MIMA v Khawar
|
[2002] HCA 14; (2002) 210 CLR 1; (2002) 187 ALR 574; (2002) 67 ALD 577; (2002) 76 ALJR 667; (2002) 23 Leg Rep 11; [2002] CA 14
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
9141 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
[2000] UKHL 37; [2001] 1 AC 489; [2000] 3 All ER 577; [2000] 3 WLR 379; [2000] INLR 239; [2000] Imm AR 552
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
6 Jul 2000
|
BAILII
|
|
398 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shah
|
[1999] UKHL 20; [1999] 2 AC 629; [1999] 2 All ER 545; (1999) 6 BHRC 356; [1999] INLR 144; [1999] Imm AR 283; [1999] 2 WLR 1015; (1999) 2 CHRLD 424
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
25 Mar 1999
|
BAILII
|
|
304 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|