International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc
|
[2015] UKSC 33; [2016] AC 509; [2015] 2 WLR 1471
|
United Kingdom Supreme Court
|
United Kingdom
|
20 May 2015
|
BAILII
|
|
22 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Durham v BAI (Run off) Ltd; Re Employers' Liability Policy 'Trigger' Litigation
|
[2012] UKSC 14; [2012] 3 All ER 1161; [2012] 1 WLR 867; [2012] All ER (D) 201
|
United Kingdom Supreme Court
|
United Kingdom
|
28 Mar 2012
|
BAILII
|
|
31 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd
|
[2008] 1 AC 289
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2008
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Lay v Employers Mutual Ltd
|
[2005] NSWCA 450; (2005) 66 NSWLR 270; (2005) 3 DDCR 296
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
circa 2005
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
Orica Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd
|
[2003] NSWCA 331; (2003) 59 NSWLR 14; (2003) 1 DDCR 87; (2004) 13 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-596
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
11 Nov 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
69 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Central Asbestos Co v Dodd
|
[1973] AC 518; [1972] 2 All ER 1135; (1972) 3 WLR 333; 13 KIR 75; [1972] 2 Lloyds Rep 413
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1973
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
105 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Brown v North British Steel Foundry Ltd
|
[1968] SC 51
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1968
|
|
|
12
|
Cartledge v E Jopling & Sons Ltd
|
[1963] AC 758; [1963] 1 All ER 341
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1963
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
302 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Smith v Mann
|
[1932] HCA 30; (1932) 47 CLR 426; [1932] ALR 397
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
4 Aug 1932
|
AustLII
|
|
92 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|