Lane v Hindrum
|
[2013] TASSC 50
|
Supreme Court of Tasmania
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
10 Sep 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
CTM v R
|
[2008] HCA 25; (2008) 236 CLR 440; (2008) 247 ALR 1; (2008) 185 A Crim R 188; (2008) 82 ALJR 978
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 2008
|
AustLII
|
|
205 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Jiminez v R
|
[1992] HCA 14; (1992) 173 CLR 572; 106 ALR 162; 15 MVR 289; 59 A Crim R 308; 66 ALJR 292
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
6 May 1992
|
AustLII
|
|
262 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Kural v R
|
[1987] HCA 16; (1987) 162 CLR 502; 70 ALR 658; 29 A Crim R 12; 61 ALJR 239
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
7 May 1987
|
AustLII
|
|
131 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Gibbon v Fitzmaurice
|
[1986] TASSC 55; (1986) 23 A Crim R 12; [1986] Tas R 137
|
Supreme Court of Tasmania
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
22 Sep 1986
|
AustLII
|
|
5
|
L v R
|
[1985] TASSC 44; [1985] Tas R 112
|
Supreme Court of Tasmania
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
24 Sep 1985
|
AustLII
|
|
3
|
He Kaw Teh v R
|
[1985] HCA 43; (1985) 157 CLR 523; (1985) 60 ALR 449; 15 A Crim R 203; (1985) 59 ALJR 620; [1986] LRC (Crim) 553
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
11 Jul 1985
|
AustLII
|
|
832 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
F v Ling R
|
[1985] Tas R 112; [1985] TASSC 44
|
Supreme Court of Tasmania
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
circa 1985
|
AustLII
|
|
6
|
Sweet v Parsley
|
[1969] UKHL 1; [1970] AC 132; [1969] 1 All ER 347; (1969) 53 Cr App R 221; [1969] 2 WLR 470
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
23 Jan 1969
|
BAILII
|
|
313 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Turnbull
|
[1943] NSWStRp 56; (1943) 44 SR (NSW) 108; 61 WN (NSW) 70
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
23 Dec 1943
|
AustLII
|
|
52 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Proudman v Dayman
|
[1941] HCA 28; (1941) 67 CLR 536
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
22 Sep 1941
|
AustLII
|
|
399 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Woolmington v DPP
|
[1935] UKHL 1; (1935) 25 Cr App R 72; (1935) 5 New Zealand Police Law Reports 492
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1935
|
BAILII
|
|
70 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|