LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"An Imperfect Protection: Attitudes of Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners to Confidentiality"   flag 

[2017] BondLawRw 4
Harman, Joe
Bond Law Review
Australia

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005 (Cth)
Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth)
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s31, s36, s39, s101, s131, s135, s136
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s4, s4AB, s10F, s10H, s10J, s11A, s13C, s60CC, s60I, s67ZA, s68L, s69ZT, s89, s97, s25
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Should Mediation be the First Step in all Family Law Act Proceedings?" (2016) 27 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 17 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal Australia circa 2016 Legal Online flag
"Inconsistencies in and the Inadequacies of the Family Counselling and FDR Confidentiality and Admissibility Provisions: The Need for Reform" (2014) 4 (4) Family Law Review 213 Family Law Review Canada circa 2014 flag
R v Baden-Clay [2013] QSC 351 Supreme Court of Queensland Australia - Queensland 19 Dec 2013 AustLII flag
UnitingCare - Unifam Counselling & Mediation v Harkiss [2011] FamCAFC 159; (2011) 252 FLR 309; [2011] FLC 93-476; (2011) 46 Fam LR 12 Family Court of Australia Australia 5 Aug 2011 AustLII flag
"In Defence of the 2006 Amendments to the Family Law Act" (2011) 1 (3) Family Law Review 151 Family Law Review Canada circa 2011 flag
"The Adversarial System and the Search for Truth" (2011) 37 Monash University Law Review 135 Monash University Law Review Australia circa 2011 AustLII flag
Rastall v Ball (2010) 44 Fam LR 256 Australia circa 2010 LexisNexis AU flag
"Perceptions" (2009) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 163 Journal of Dispute Resolution United States circa 2009 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag
R v Liddy (No 2) [2001] SASC 117; (2001) 79 SASR 401; (2001) 160 FLR 342; (2001) 28 Fam LR 377; (2001) 122 A Crim R 21 Supreme Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia circa 2001 AustLII flag
Anglicare (WA) v Department of Family & Children's Services [2000] WASC 47; 26 Fam LR 218 Supreme Court of Western Australia Australia - Western Australia 14 Feb 2000 AustLII flag
Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 1; (1997) 189 CLR 146; (1997) 141 ALR 353; 71 ALJR 294 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth circa 1997 AustLII flag
Benson v Hughes [1994] FamCA 30; 123 FLR 175; [1994] FLC 92-483; (1994) 17 Fam LR 761 Family Court of Australia Australia 30 Mar 1994 AustLII flag
Cutts v Head [1984] Ch 290 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1984 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag
Baker v Campbell [1983] HCA 39; (1983) 153 CLR 52; (1983) 49 ALR 385; (1983) 57 ALJR 749; 14 ATR 713; 83 ATC 4,606 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth circa 1983 AustLII flag
R v Bell; Ex parte Lees [1980] HCA 26; (1980) 146 CLR 141; [1980] FLC 90-850; 30 ALR 489; 54 ALJR 412; 6 Fam LR 208 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 5 Aug 1980 AustLII flag
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] ALR 367; 32 ALJR 395; (1959) 18 CA 8 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 3 Mar 1959 AustLII flag
Field v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1957] HCA 92; (1957) 99 CLR 285; 32 ALJR 110; [1958] ALR (CN) 1055 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 19 Dec 1957 AustLII flag
Miranda v Arizona 384 US 436 United States Supreme Court United States circa 2014 Westlaw flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback