9999u16a 6e2fu16a 7279u16a 5225u16a 884cu16a 653fu16a 5340u16a 8a34u16a 6881u16a 980cu16a 6046u16a
|
[2020] HKCFI 2152
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
23 Jun 2020
|
HKLII
|
|
8
|
é¦æ ¯ç¹å¥ æ ¿å ¨ æ å ©ç ¦å å ¦
|
[2020] 1 HKLRD 1246
|
|
Hong Kong
|
circa 2020
|
|
|
|
HKSAR v Chow Nok Hang
|
(2013) 16 HKCFAR 837
|
|
Hong Kong
|
circa 2013
|
|
|
1
|
Secretary for Justice v Leung Kwok Wah
|
[2012] HKCFI 1605; [2013] 2 HKC 1; [2012] 5 HKLRD 556
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
19 Oct 2012
|
HKLII
|
|
58 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Hksar v Fok Yau WA, Patrick
|
[2011] HKCFI 1852; [2012] 3 HKLRD 392
|
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
|
Hong Kong
|
20 Dec 2011
|
HKLII
|
|
1
|
R v Sessions
|
[1998] 2 VR 304; (1997) 95 A Crim R 151
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
circa 1998
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
66 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Thomas
|
[1993] 1 Qd R 323
|
|
Australia - Queensland
|
circa 1993
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
4
|
R v Howell
|
[1982] QB 416; [1981] 3 All ER 383; [1981] 3 WLR 501
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1982
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
116 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Caird
|
(1970) 54 Cr App R 499
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1970
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
Connelly v DPP
|
[1964] AC 1254; [1964] 2 All ER 401; (1964) 48 Cr App R 183; [1964] 2 WLR 1145
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1964
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
826 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
(R v Donovan
|
[1934] 2 KB 498
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1934
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
103 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Connolly v Meagher
|
[1906] HCA 20; (1906) 3 CLR 682
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
19 Apr 1906
|
AustLII
|
|
30 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Boxer v R
|
81 A Crim R 299
|
|
Australia
|
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
|