FCS17 v Mha
|
[2020] FCAFC 68; (2020) 276 FCR 644
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
21 Apr 2020
|
AustLII
|
|
96 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
ABAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2)
|
[2016] FCA 721; (2016) 242 FCR 11; (2016) 69 AAR 480
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
17 Jun 2016
|
AustLII
|
|
24 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
MIAC v SZQRB
|
[2013] FCAFC 33; (2013) 210 FCR 505; (2013) 296 ALR 525; (2013) 132 ALD 269
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
20 Mar 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
2287 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
MIAC v Mzyyl
|
[2012] FCAFC 147; (2012) 207 FCR 211; (2012) 133 ALD 465
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
24 Oct 2012
|
AustLII
|
|
295 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
SZFDV v MIAC
|
[2007] HCA 41; (2007) 233 CLR 51; (2007) 237 ALR 660; (2007) 81 ALJR 1679; 97 ALD 27
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
30 Aug 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
1644 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Szatv v MIAC
|
[2007] HCA 40; (2007) 233 CLR 18; (2007) 237 ALR 634; (2007) 81 ALJR 1659; (2007) 97 ALD 1; [2007] ALMD 6400
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
2164 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|