LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Wiehahn Konstruksie Toerustingmaatskappy (Edms) Bpk v Potgieter     7

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Obiang v Van Rensburg (A119 / 2022)	[2023] ZAWCHC 17; [2023] 2 All SA 211	High Court of South Africa - Western Cape Division	South Africa	3 Feb 2023	SAFLII
Mofokeng v Motloung	[2022] ZAGPJHC 546	South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg	South Africa	12 Aug 2022	SAFLII
Bondev (Midrand) (Pty) Ltd v Van Blerk (909/2014)	[2019] ZAGPPHC 466	North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria	South Africa	30 Aug 2019	SAFLII		1
Purpose of rule 4 is to provide for a mechanism by which relative certainty can be obtained that service has been effected upon a defendant If certain minimum standards are complied with as set out in the rule, then the assumption is made that the service was sufficient to reach the defendant's attention and his failure to take steps is not due to the fact that he does not have knowledge of the summons The converse is not true — namely that if service is not effected as required by the rule, the service is not effective — in that the purpose for which service is required was fulfilled, namely the defendant came to know of the summons The rules, as was pointed out by Roux J in United Reflective Converters (Pty) Ltd v Levine, 1	988 SA 460		South Africa	10 May 2016	LexisNexis		2
Prism Payment Technologies (Pty) Ltd v Altech Information Technologies (Pty) Ltd t/a Altech Card Solutions (2010/38713)	[2011] ZAGPJHC 98; 2012 5 SA 267	South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg	South Africa	7 Jun 2011	SAFLII		18
China State Construction Engineering Pty Ltd v Pro Joinery Close Corparation (A230 2007 pdf)	[2007] NAHC 86	High Court of Namibia	Namibia	6 Dec 2007	SAFLII
Great Kei Municipality v Danmist Properties CC (ECJ 2004/032)	[2004] ZAECHC 32; [2004] 4 All SA 298	Eastern Cape Division of the High Court of South Africa	South Africa	10 Sep 2004	SAFLII		4