LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Going to the facts of the present case, the applicant's evidence of an offer to work and the refusal of that offer, having been accepted, would, we should have thought, have justified an inference that the applicant was ready, willing and able to perform appropriate light work offered to him However, the Commission was not bound to draw that inference as a matter of law Likewise, the evidence of the applicant as to the work which he was willing to do was evidence, which if accepted by the Commission, would have justified or supported the relevant finding, but the Commission was not bound, as a matter of law, to accept that evidence In declining to draw the inference, and in not accepting the applicant's evidence, the Commission may have been wrong in fact, but even if its rejection was so wrong as to be perverse, that rejection would not have constituted an error of law "    

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Carr v Neill	[1999] NSWSC 1263	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	17 Dec 1999	AustLII