LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Re Rex D Schrader and Eugene D Klingaman    

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Corporation v Excel Communications Inc	172 F3d 1352; 50 USPQ2d 1447	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	14 Apr 1999	WorldLII
State Street Bank Trust Co v Signature Financial Group Inc	149 F3d 1368; 47 USPQ2d 1596	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	23 Jul 1998	WorldLII
Re Karen I Trovato and Leendert Dorst	42 F3d 1376; 33 USPQ2d 1194	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	19 Dec 1994	WorldLII
Re Thomas Ph Warmerdam and Bernard Jh Verwer	33 F3d 1354; 31 USPQ2d 1754	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	11 Aug 1994	WorldLII
Re Kuriappan P Alappat Edward E Averill and James G Larsen	63 USLW 2088	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	29 Jul 1994	WorldLII
Re Kuriappan P Alappat Edward E Averill and James G Larsen	63 USLW 2088	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	29 Jul 1994	WorldLII

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
"Patentability of Non-Physical Inventions: Lessons from the United States, The"	(2009) 35 Monash University Law Review 376	McEniery, Ben	Australia	circa 2009	AustLII
"An Essay on the Eligibility of Business Methods for Australian Patent Protection"	[2002] JlLawInfoSci 2	Brennan, David J	Australia	circa 2002	AustLII
"An Argument Against Business Method Patents Demonstrating That Algorithms Are Abstract and Business Methods Are Obvious"	[2001] JlLawInfoSci 2	Gladstone, Julia Alpert; Esq	Australia	circa 2001	AustLII
Lea, Gary --- "The Revolution That Never Was: A Cynic's Eye View of the Software, Business and E-Commerce Method Patenting Controversy in the Wake of State Street" [2000] DigTechLawJl 4	(2000) 2 Digital Technology Law Journal 4	Gary Lea	Australia	circa 2000	AustLII
"Streaming the Software Development Process Through Reuse and Patents"	[1999] JlLawInfoSci 4	Moens, Annelies	Australia	circa 1999	AustLII
"Internet Patents"	[1999] JlLawInfoSci 8	Middleton, Gaye	Australia	circa 1999	AustLII
"Patents for Algorithms in Australia"	(1998) 20 Sydney Law Review 517	Christie, Andrew; Syme, Serena	Australia	circa 1998	AustLII
"Recent Software Patent Developments in the United States"	[1994] JlLawInfoSci 17	Swinson, John	Australia	circa 1994	AustLII

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc v Corazonix Corporation	958 F2d 1053; 2 USPQ2d 1033; 22 USPQ2d 1033; 60 USLW 2603	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	5 May 1992	WorldLII
Astoria Fed Sav & Loan Ass'n v Solimino	501 US 104; 115 L Ed 2d 96; 111 SCt 2166	United States Supreme Court	United States	10 Jun 1991	WorldLII
McDermott Int'l, Inc v Wilander	498 US 337; 112 L Ed 2d 866; 111 SCt 807	United States Supreme Court	United States	19 Feb 1991	WorldLII
Re Ralph R Grams and Dennis C Lezotte	888 F2d 835; 12 USPQ2d 1824; 58 USLW 2328	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	3 Nov 1989	WorldLII
Intervet America Inc v Kee-Vet Laboratories Inc D	887 F2d 1050; 12 USPQ2d 1474	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	6 Oct 1989	WorldLII
Nemours & Co v Phillips Petroleum Co	849 F2d 1430; 7 USPQ2d 1129; 57 USLW 2043	United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit	United States	15 Jun 1988	WorldLII
Diamond v Diehr	450 US 175; 209 USPQ 1; 67 L Ed 2d 155; 101 SCt 1048	United States Supreme Court	United States	3 Mar 1981	WorldLII
Diamond v Chakrabarty	447 US 303; 206 USPQ 193; 65 L Ed 2d 144; 100 SCt 2204	United States Supreme Court	United States	16 Jun 1980	WorldLII
Parker v Flook	437 US 584; 198 USPQ 193; 57 L Ed 2d 451; 98 SCt 2522	United States Supreme Court	United States	22 Jun 1978	WorldLII
Dann v Johnston	425 US 219; 189 USPQ 257; 47 L Ed 2d 692; 96 SCt 1393	United States Supreme Court	United States	31 Mar 1976	WorldLII
Gottschalk v Benson	409 US 63; 175 USPQ 673; 34 L Ed 2d 273; 93 SCt 253	United States Supreme Court	United States	20 Nov 1972	WorldLII
Barber v Gonzales	347 US 637; 98 L Ed 1009; 74 SCt 822	United States Supreme Court	United States	7 Jun 1954	WorldLII
Telephone Cases	126 US 1; 31 L Ed 863; 8 SCt 778	United States Supreme Court	United States	19 Mar 1888	WorldLII
White v Dunbar	119 US 47; 7 SCt 72; 30 L Ed 303; [1886] Dec Commr Pat 494	United States Supreme Court	United States	15 Nov 1886	WorldLII
Tilghman v Proctor	102 US 707; 26 L Ed 279	United States Supreme Court	United States	1 Oct 1880	WorldLII
Cochrane v Deener	94 US 780; 24 L Ed 139	United States Supreme Court	United States	1 Oct 1876	WorldLII
Rubber-Tip Pencil Co v Howard	87 US 498; 20 Wall 498; 22 L Ed 410	United States Supreme Court	United States	1 Oct 1874	WorldLII
Accord In re Meyer	688 F2d 789; 215 USPQ 193		United States		Westlaw
Re Abele	684 F2d 902; 214 USPQ 682		United States		Westlaw
681 f2d 787	681 F2d 787; 214 USPQ 678		United States		Westlaw
In re Gelnovatch	595 F2d 32; 201 USPQ 136		United States		Westlaw
In re Toma	575 F2d 872; 197 USPQ 852		United States		Westlaw
Paine, Webber, Jackson and Curtis v Merrill Lynch	564 FSupp 1358; 218 USPQ 212		United States		Westlaw
Briddle v Texas	488 US 986; 102 L Ed 2d 572; 109 SCt 542	United States Supreme Court	United States		Westlaw
Musgrave	431 F2d 882; 167 USPQ 280; 57 CCPA 1352		United States		Westlaw
Prater and Wei	415 F2d 1393; (1404-05) 162 USPQ 541; 56 CCPA 1381		United States		Westlaw
In re Prater	415 F2d 1378; (1387-88) 159 USPQ 583		United States		Westlaw
394 f2d 869	394 F2d 869; 55 CCPA 1121; 157 USPQ 615		United States		Westlaw
Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co	160 F 467
127 f2d 324	127 F2d 324; 29 CCPA 982		United States		Westlaw
53 Uspq 376	53 USPQ 376		United States
Response: The Models Are Broken, The Models Are Broken	47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 1023	University of Pittsburgh Law Review	United States		HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"The Patentability of Algorithms"	47 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 959	University of Pittsburgh Law Review	United States		HeinOnline / LexisNexis
35 USC 112	35 USC 112	United States Code	United States		LII (Cornell)
35 USC 101	35 USC 101	United States Code	United States		LII (Cornell)
35 USC 100	35 USC 100	United States Code	United States		LII (Cornell)
22 l Ed 410	22 L Ed 410	United States Supreme Court	United States		LexisNexis
15 How 252; 14 l Ed 683	15 How 252; 14 L Ed 683	United Stated Supreme Court	United States		LexisNexis
Ex parte Murray	9 USPQ2d 1819		United States