[Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback] High Court of Australia Special Leave Dispositions

You are here: 

Colin Candy v Ian McPhail & Anor [2013] HCASL 176 (3 December 2013)

Last Updated: 3 December 2013

COLIN CANDY
v
IAN MCPHAIL & ANOR
[2013] HCASL 176
B35/2013

1. This is an application for special leave to appeal from the orders of the Court of Appeal of Queensland (Holmes and White JJA and Philippides J) dismissing an appeal from an unsuccessful application for judicial review of a decision made by the first respondent. That decision, made in March 2001, was to refuse to grant the applicant a rescue permit[1] allowing him to keep a red kangaroo. The kangaroo is dead.
2. The kangaroo had been removed from the applicant's home by officers of the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service in March 2001. The removal gave rise to proceedings in the Supreme Court of Queensland for trespass[2]. An issue for determination in those proceedings was whether the red kangaroo was a "protected animal" under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Q). Douglas J held that it was. That conclusion was upheld in the Court of Appeal[3]. Special leave to appeal from that determination was refused[4].
3. The application for judicial review was based on a contention that the kangaroo was not a protected animal. In an ex tempore judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Queensland (Wilson J) on 12 November 2012 the application was dismissed.
4. The Court of Appeal rejected the contention that its earlier decision determining the status of the red kangaroo was wrong. It dismissed the appeal.
5. Nothing in the applicant's prolix grounds or written case identify an arguable basis for challenging the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal.
6. The application is dismissed.
7. Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
   

[1] Nature Conservation Regulation 1994 (Q), s 5.

[2] Candy v Thompson [2005] QSC 111.

[3] Candy v Thompson [2005] QCA 382; [2005] Aust Torts Reports 81-809.

[4] Candy v Thompson  [2006] HCATrans 220.