You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Australia Special Leave Dispositions >>
2023 >>
[2023] HCASL 186
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Context | No Context | Help
Ms.
Newett
v Mr.
Newett
& Ors [2023] HCASL 186 (7 December 2023)
Last Updated: 7 December 2023
MS
NEWETT 
v
MR
NEWETT
&
ORS
[2023] HCASL 186
B41/2023
- The
applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to
appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and
Family Court of Australia
(Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (Aldridge, Kari and Brasch JJ)
dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family
Court (Division 1) (Baumann J). The applicant has also filed an
application seeking,
amongst other things, to place fresh evidence before this
Court, and orders for various interlocutory relief.
- An
appeal to this Court would enjoy no prospects of success. It would therefore be
futile to grant the extension of time that is
sought. Special leave to appeal is
refused.
- In
these circumstances, the applicant's interlocutory application should also be
refused. Moreover, and in any event, this Court
does not have the power to
receive fresh evidence in its appellate jurisdiction: Eastman v The Queen
(2000) 203 CLR 1. The interlocutory application is
refused.
Gordon J
Steward J
7 December 2023
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCASL/2023/186.html