You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Migration Review Tribunal of Australia >>
2014 >>
[2014] MRTA 2202
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Context] [No Context] [Help]
1318328 [2014] MRTA 2202 (22 September 2014)
Last Updated: 8 October 2014
1318328 [2014] MRTA 2202 (22 September 2014)
DECISION RECORD
APPLICANT: Mr Yong Chen
MRT CASE NUMBER: 1318328
DIBP REFERENCE(S): CLF2013/59363
TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Adam Moore
DATE: 22 September 2014
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant
a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
Statement made on 22 September 2014 at 12:15pm
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
- This
is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister
for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant
a Student (Temporary) (Class
TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
- The
applicant applied to the Department of Immigration for the visa on 14 March
2013. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the
visa on 19 November 2013. At
the time the visa application was lodged, the Student (Temporary) (Class TU)
visa contained a number
of subclasses: Item 1222 of Schedule 1 to the Migration
Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). Generally speaking, the subclass that can be
granted depends upon: the type of course in which the applicant is
enrolled or
has an offer of enrolment as his or her principal course (Subclass 570 - 575);
for certain applications made on or after
24 March 2012, whether the applicant
is an ‘eligible higher degree student’ (Subclass 573 – 574) or
‘eligible
university exchange student’ or ‘eligible non-award
student’ (Subclass 575); whether the applicant has the support
of the
relevant Minister (Subclass 576); or whether the applicant has applied on the
basis of being a Student Guardian (Subclass
580).
- The
delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not satisfy the
requirements of cl.572.223(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to
the Regulations because she
was not satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia
temporarily.
- The
applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 19 September 2014 to give evidence
and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted
with the assistance of
an interpreter in the Mandarin and English languages.
- For
the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review
should be affirmed.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
- The
applicant has not provided evidence of enrolment. The applicant said that he
wishes to undertake a Diploma of Project Management.
Having regard to the
applicant’s proposed course of study, the relevant subclass in this case
is Subclass 572.
- The
issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets the time of decision
criterion in cl.572.223. Clause 572.223(1)(a) relevantly
states:
(1) The Minister is satisfied that the applicant is a
genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because:
(a) the Minister is satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in
Australia temporarily, having regard to:
(i) the applicant’s circumstances; and
(ii) the applicant’s immigration history; and
(iii) if the applicant is a minor – the intentions of a parent, legal
guardian or spouse of the applicant; and
(iv) any other relevant matter; and
(b) ...
- In
considering whether the applicant satisfies this criterion, the Tribunal must
have regard to Direction No.53, Assessing the genuine temporary entrant
criterion for Student visa applications, made under s.499 of the Act. This
Direction requires the Tribunal to have regard to a number of specified factors
in relation to:
- the
applicant’s circumstances in their home country, potential circumstances
in Australia, and the value of the course to the
applicant’s future;
- the
applicant’s immigration history, including previous applications for an
Australian visa or for visas to other countries,
and previous travel to
Australia or other countries;
- if the applicant
is a minor, the intentions of a parent, legal guardian or spouse of the
applicant; and
- any other
relevant information provided by the applicant, or information otherwise
available to the decision maker, including information
that may be either
beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.
- The
Direction indicates that the factors specified should not be used as a checklist
but rather, are intended to guide decision makers
to weigh up the
applicant’s circumstances as a whole, in reaching a finding about whether
the applicant satisfies the genuine
temporary entrant criterion.
- The
applicant submitted the following documents to the Tribunal:
- a
personal statement;
- an
academic transcript for an Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management issued 7
May 2009;
- a
statement of results for a Certificate III in Engineering-Mechanical Trade
issued 27 January 2010;
- a
letter from Chisholm Institute stating that the applicant was enrolled in a
Diploma of Engineering Technology and Certificate III
in Engineering
(Refrigeration and Air Conditioning) from 6 July 2009 to 30 June 2011;
- various
certificates of enrolment for courses in the past;
- evidence
that the applicant has completed a diploma of business in the period 15 July
2012 to 14 December 2012;
- a
copy of the primary Decision Record.
- The
applicant’s statement reads as follows:
Dear Case Officer,
This is CHEN Yong writing to you in regards to my MRT application and explain
the whole study history and purpose of my further study.
(First of all, I apologize for bringing trouble to you. I am deeply aware that
the stupid mistakes I made has affected my career,
and I have been in the midst
of deep introspection. I have already been in Australia for 6 years, and I feel
very unsatisfied with
my own attitude towards studying and my academic
achievements , I feel that peviously, I am so young and so naïve that I
made
too many stupid mistakes)
Once I was a child who was only interested in games, and I merely would like to
devote into the things I like. But since high school,
I felt increasingly bored
of studying, and my parents were worried about me and tried to persuade me but
failed. In fact, my parents
had their own business related to physical therapy.
But at first, they were reluctant to let me learn about financial matters, on
the other hand, they had the desire to let me gain advanced experience in the
society independently, and after this, they will consider
whether I should take
over their business or not. My parents travel a lot for business, therefore I am
always alone at home, which
gradually developed my self-care abilities, and I
can even make some delicious dishes. As a result, I decided to go to Australia
to choose the chef course. So I applied for Certificate Ill of Commercial
Cookery in Carrick. Meanwhile, my parents were so worried
about my ability to
learn and they were afraid that I could not keep pace with the University, so I
chose the diploma studies.
At the beginning, I was excited about studying but when I arrived in Melbourne,
only to find that there were many completely different
things and all of a
sudden I feel unadapted to all the unfamiliar surroundings. So after 1 year's
study in Carrick, I lost my interest
in cooking and did not want to be a chef
any more, as a consequence, I considered to change for another major.
I decided to transfer to Chisholm to start my Certificate III of Mechanic trade
of airconditioning without discussing with my parents.
Because a friend of mine
has an air conditioning company, and it seems that this major has a promising
prospect. What attracted me
most is that I feel that I have a strong practical
ability which enables me to better study about this field. This is the main
reason
for me to change my major again into project management. My score was
good at first, but after learning more and more, I find it
increasingly
difficult, after failing the exam several times, I felt I left behind and there
was gradually a widening gap between
my classmates and me. With conflicting
emotions, I chose to escape, for example, sometimes I would neither like to get
up in the
morning nor go to the class, and sometimes I went to my friend's
company as an apprentice. And this is why I did not complete the
courses, but
time passed so quickly, when other students were going to graduate, I could not
get a diploma.
During the year 2011 , I enrolled in certificate IV in ESL with a strong desire
to improve my English language skills, and I believe
this program is capable of
offering me a great opportunity to practice my English skills.
Now when I think about myself during that time, I know that I had made a bigger
mistake which is overlooking the visa request. I
talked to my parents about this
situation expressing my thought to go back to China. My parents were anxious but
disagreed my return
to China without learning anything. And they had a
substantive requirement to me, which was that they asked me to study business
and management and never allowed me to repeat my previous mistakes.
With the help of the education agent, I chose to study and completed Certificate
IV of Business Management and Diploma of Business
Management in TK Melboume from
March 2012 to December 2012. In terms of the study in project managemet, I
believe it will largely
benefit me in my future career. Throughout these years
of study, I have always been trying to figure out the true interest of mine
and
trying to find an area in which I would like to develop my future career. Not
long ago, one of my best friends recommended me
the Project Management program
taught by Australian National Institute of Business & Technology, as he has
finished a similar
program in the education provider and has successful in
finding a fine-job,1 have-inquired the education provider about some details
of
the program and the potential career opportunities after finishing the course.
It turned out that this program very much fits
my expectations and is very
likely to lead me to an Ideal career path thus benefit me in the long-term.
My parents and I have reached an agreement on the choosing of the courses and
the education provider, considering the quality and
the affordability of the
courses. Also, we all believe that Australia is an ideal place for me to
undertake the courses. First of
all, my parents and I believe that one of the
biggest advantages for me to live and study in Australia is that I will be
allowed
to practice my English very often. As stated above, I consider English
as a very important communication tool in the international
job market and I am
keen to improve my English as much as possible. In addition, my parents and I
are convinced that Australia's
educational system is one of the best in the
world, and a degree granted from an Australian educational provider could
enhance my
possibility in finding a good job or taking my home business when I
go back to China. Lastly, I have been living in Australia for
quite a long time
and I know things here in Australia very well, in this regard, compared to
undertake the courses in other countries,
Australia is more likely to enable me
to focus myself on study from various distractions, such as housing and
transporting problems.
My parents have been working in management positions in China for many years,
and I have been dreaming of having a similar job since
I was very little. Based
on that dream, I enrolled in the programs of my previous studies. However,
during my previous studies, I
did not find some of the programs very helpful in
terms of leading to my dream job. Nevertheless, I do believe that the knowledge
and skills from my previous studies would largely help me in my future study and
work. Apart from that, the Certificate IV and Diploma
of Business Management I
completed in TK Melbourne did give me some insights in business and I found
myself very much interested
in some particular business-related subjects, among
which project management is one, and that is the main reason for me to decide
to
undertake a further program in project management.
After I complete my course, I will come back to my own country China, and I will
start my career in my parents' company and try to
apply all the theories I have
learned to the work. And I have a strong belief that all the knowledge and
skills I obtained in Australia
will enable me to better deal with the issues in
my work. I have a strong desire to go back to China because all my family
members
are in China, and my parents really sacrifice so much for me and I have
the duty to take care of them. So I would like to use all
my knowledge and
skills to contribute to the people and society I love in my-own country
Sincerely hope that you will give me the second chance, and I am deeply aware of
my mistakes, and I promise that I will not make
such mistakes again, and will
not make jokes about my future. I really do not want to live with regrets
completing my university
career, so please consider my circumstance and please
approve my visa application. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you
require any further information from me. I look forward to your reply. Thank you
very much.
- At
the hearing I discussed with the applicant the Direction No. 53
factors.
The applicant’s circumstances in their home country, potential
circumstances in Australia, and the value of the course to the
applicant’s
future;
- The
applicant comes from Tianjin in northern China. He has his parents and
grandmother. He is an only child. His parents run a
beauty therapy business.
They have 2 shops. The applicant describes his family as relatively well-off
compared to others in his
country. Each shop employs 10 staff. The applicant
said that he thinks a qualification in project management will assist him to
help his parents with the business.
- The
applicant said that there are no military service commitments or political civil
unrest factors that would serve as incentives
for him not to return to
China.
- The
applicant said he has no ties to Australia. He said he has no family and he is
single. He says he rents a house where he lives
by himself. When I asked him
how he supported himself financially in Australia, he said he lives off a credit
card which his parents
pay off for him.
- The
applicant said if he was able to enrol he would finish his project management
qualification and then he wants to enrol in university
in the same field. He
said he has a Diploma in Business and hopefully he will finish the Diploma of
Project Management then he said
he will talk to his parents to ask their opinion
about which discipline he should pursue at university.
- When
I asked the applicant if he had current enrolments he initially said yes,
referring to the certificates of enrolment for a Certificate
IV and a Diploma of
Project Management. I said to the applicant that I did not think these could be
current as the course end dates
had passed. I said to the applicant that it
seemed that he was not enrolled in the course of study. The applicant conceded
this
and said that he hasn’t because he has not had a decision on his visa
and no school would accept his application for enrolment.
I said to the
applicant that I may not accept this because I was aware that students could
obtain enrolments even while waiting
for a review. The applicant replied it was
only in November 2013 when he was asked to provide study records did he realise
that
he should have continue to study while waiting for the review. I said to
the applicant then that he realised in November 2013 he
should study but he has
not done any study up until the day of the hearing. I told the applicant the
fact that he is not studied
when he told me that he knew that he could have is a
factor that weighs against him. The applicant said that he understood but he
did not know what to do while he was waiting for the decision and no school
would accept his application. I asked him how many schools
he had spoken to.
The applicant replied that his agent has talked to 3 schools for him. The
applicant said he also tried to speak
to choose to finish his course but they
were not satisfied with his visa status and they asked him to obtain a visa
first.
- I
asked the applicant how qualification in business or project management would
assist him with his future in China. He said his
parents are preparing to
further expand their business and they will open up more shops. He said they do
not wanting to work in
the shops, rather they wanting to learn so he can help
them manage the shops in the future. I asked the applicant what he had said
his
parents about being in Australia for so long and only obtaining 2 qualifications
in business. The applicant said both of his
parents understand it is not very
good studying and he knows it is made a lot of mistakes and even though they are
not happy with
his performance they are still very supportive. He said after he
finished the diploma of business they could see the evidence that
he has changed
so they would like to give him another chance to do more study. The applicant
said does not want to go back without
learning anything.
The applicant’s immigration history, including previous applications for
an Australian visa or for visas to other countries,
and previous travel to
Australia or other countries;
- The
applicant came to Australia in May 2008. There is no evidence before me of any
previous adverse interactions with the Department.
- His
poor study history, however, is a factor which weighs against
him.
Any other relevant information provided by the applicant, or information
otherwise available to the decision maker, including information
that may be
either beneficial or unfavourable to the applicant.
- At
the end of the hearing, the applicant said it is very hard thing to provide any
further documents and evidence and he knows that
he has made a lot of stupid
mistakes in the past. He said he was young and naive but now it he is an adult
so he hopes that the
mistakes is made in the past will not affect his future.
He said he is asking for another chance.
Assessment
- The
applicant’s study history is very poor. In the 6 years he has been here,
he has only completed an 8 week English language
course and a Certificate IV and
Diploma of business. I note from his own evidence that he submitted that these
courses latter were
only of 6 months duration. I note that the applicant did
pass some units of an Advanced Diploma Of Hospitality Management in 2008
and
some units of a Certificate III In Engineering-Mechanical Trade in 2009. In my
assessment the applicant’s study history
is a factor which weighs heavily
against him. I do not accept the applicant’s assurances that he genuinely
wishes to engage
in study and return to China. My main reason for coming to
this conclusion is not only his past history, but also that the applicant
on his
own admission knew from November 2013 that he should be engaging in study but
has not. I do not accept that he has been unable
to do so because of his visa
status. I doubt his evidence that he has made attempts to contact education
providers either in person
or through his agent.
- The
applicant states that his family operates a small business, being two beauty
therapy salons. He has, however, not provided any
evidence of this. I am not,
therefore, persuaded that course or courses the applicant says he wishes to
undertake would be of benefit
to his future.
- I
am also concerned that the applicant stated during the hearing that he wishes to
go on to undertake a degree. Given his poor study
history, I find this claim
dubious and it tends to indicate to me that the applicant wishes to continue to
use the student visa program
as a means of maintaining indefinite residence in
Australia.
- On
the evidence before me, I can detect no significant other factors that would
serve as incentives for the applicant to either return
to China or remain in
Australia.
- On
the basis of the above, and having considered the applicant’s
circumstances, immigration history, and other matters it considers
relevant, the
Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in
Australia temporarily. Accordingly, the applicant
does not meet
cl.572.223(1)(a).
- The
Tribunal has found the applicant does not meet an essential requirement of
cl.572.223. With the exception of Subclass 580, the
other subclasses within visa
Class TU all contain an identical requirement. For reasons given above, the
Tribunal also finds that
the applicant does not meet the requirements of these
subclasses. In respect of Subclass 580 (Student Guardian) visa, there is no
material before the Tribunal that suggests the applicant meets the prescribed
criteria for that subclass. As the Tribunal has found
that the applicant does
not meet a criterion for the grant of a student visa, it must affirm the
decision under review.
DECISION
- The
Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary)
(Class TU) visa.
Adam Moore
Member
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/MRTA/2014/ 2202 .html