You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia >>
2019 >>
[2019] AATA 4254
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Context | No Context | Help
Sidebottom and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 4254 (3 October 2019)
Last Updated: 22 October 2019
Sidebottom and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services
second review) [2019] AATA 4254 (3 October 2019)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
File Number(s): 2018/7125
Re: David Sidebottom
APPLICANT
And Secretary, Department of Social Services
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Tribunal: Mrs J C Kelly,
Senior Member
Date: 3 October 2019
Date of written reasons: 18 October 2019
Place: Sydney
For the reasons given orally at the conclusion
of the hearing of this matter, the Tribunal affirms the decision of the Social
Services
and Child Support Division of this Tribunal dated 6 November 2018.
...............................[SGD].........................................
Mrs J C Kelly, Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
SOCIAL SECURITY
– cancellation of age pension and refusal of new claim for age pension -
Applicant exceeded income limit for
age pension - proceeds of sale of principal
residence deposited in bank account – deeming provisions apply to
calculation of
income received from deposit – Applicant not receiving age
pension immediately before period of absence from Australia - indefinite
portability not applicable - no change in circumstances since cancellation -
reviewable decision affirmed
LEGISLATION
Social Security Act
1991 (Cth) ss 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 23(2), 23(4), 44, 55, 1064, 1076, 1076(2),
1076(3A), 1081, 1082, 1083, 1118, 1118(1B), 1213, 1217
Social Security Administration Act 1999 (Cth) ss 80, 118
CASES
Drake v Minister for
Immigration and Ethnic Affairs No. 2 (1979) 2 ALD 634 at 645
SECONDARY MATERIALS
A Guide to
Australian Government payments
Guide to Social Security Law Instructions 4.4.2, 4.6.3.80,
7.2.2.60
REASONS FOR DECISION
Mrs J C Kelly, Senior
Member
18 October 2019
Background
- Mr
Sidebottom began receiving an age pension on 14 January 2018. When considering
leaving Australia permanently, he consulted the
Department of Human Service (the
Department)’s website. He understood it to clearly state that an age
pension was indefinitely
portable when moving overseas and there was a grace
period of 12 months when selling and buying a principal residence. On that
basis
he proceeded with his plans and sold his house and moved to the UK on 7
May 2018, where he subsequently purchased a house. Mr Sidebottom
deposited the
net proceeds of sale of his home into his bank accounts.
- He
says that when he telephoned Centrelink on 7 May 2018 to advise that he was
leaving Australia, the officer focused on the sale
of his house and took the
opportunity to cancel his age pension. The sale had settled on 6 April 2018.
Mr Sidebottom’s age
pension was cancelled on 7 May 2018 with effect
from 6 April 2018. His subsequent claim for the age pension made on the same
day
was rejected on 25 June 2018. The questions to be decided are whether the
cancellation of Mr Sidebottom’s age pension and
the rejection of his
subsequent claim for age pension were the correct or preferable decisions.
- The
reviewable decision was made on 6 November 2018 by the Social Security and Child
Support Division of this Tribunal. The Member
made the following key findings:
- Mr
Sidebottom’s deemed income together with foreign pension payments from the
UK and the Netherlands has resulted in an annual
income in excess of the cut off
rate for age pension.
- From 6 April
2018 his income exceeded the allowable limit for payment of age pension.
- Because he was
not in receipt of age pension immediately before his departure to the UK,
indefinite portability could not apply regardless
of whether his age pension was
suspended or cancelled; and
- His financial
circumstances had not relevantly changed at the time of his new claim for age
pension on 7 May 2018, which was therefore
correctly
rejected.
The regulatory scheme
- The
relevant legislation is contained in the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
(the Act), and the Social Security Administration Act 1999 (Cth) (the
Administration Act). Government policy is set out in the Guide to Social
Security Law (the Guide) and where that is relevant,
it should be applied in the
absence of cogent reasons not to follow such policy, as was held in Drake v
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs No. 2 (1979) 2 ALD 634 at
645.
- Section
55 of the Act provides that the rate of age pension is worked out using Pension
Rate Calculator A at the end of section 1064
of the Act. Module E of the rate
calculator in section 1064 sets out how to work out the effect of a
person’s ordinary income
on a person’s maximum payment rate. The
policy document, A Guide to Australian Government payments, sets out the
income test limits for a single person to receive a part pension. It states
that from 20 March – 30 June 2018,
a single person’s income needed
to be less than $51,563.20 per year to receive a part pension.
- Section
8 of the Act sets out the income test definition and relevantly defines
“income” as “an amount earned, derived or received
by the person for the person’s own use or benefit.” Subsection
8(2) provides that a reference in the Act to “an income amount earned,
derived or received” is a reference to “an income amount
earned, derived or received by any means” and “an income
amount earned, derived and received from any source (whether within or outside
Australia).”
- Division
1B of Part 3.10 of the Act provides for deeming of income from a person’s
financial assets. Section 9 of the Act defines
financial asset to include a
financial investment, which is defined to include deposit money which is defined
in subsection 8(1)
to mean in relation to a person, a person’s money that
is deposited in an account with a financial institution.
- Subsection
1076(2) of the Act provides:
A person who has financial assets is taken, for the
purposes of this Act, to receive ordinary income on those assets, in accordance
with this section.
- Further,
section 1076 provides that a person’s financial assets are added together
and deemed income is calculated from the
total amount. The deeming rates are
revised periodically in accordance with sections 1081 and 1082 of the Act. The
Tribunal emphasise
that the deeming provisions are based in legislation and not
in a policy.
- Module
A of the rate calculator establishes the overall rate calculation process. The
rate of payment is calculated separately under
both the income and assets tests.
The test that results in a lower rate of pension is the one that applies.
- Section
1118 of the Act provides for certain assets to be disregarded in calculating the
value of a person’s assets. Subsection
1118(1B) provides that the net
proceeds from the sale of a principal home are exempt from the assets test for a
period of 12 months
if the person intends to use the fund to purchase another
home, with the intent to make that home their principal home. That is
clearly
the case for Mr Sidebottom. However, the principal home sale proceeds that are
held in a financial investment are a financial
asset for income test purposes,
as set out in the Guide at 4.6.3.80 and 4.4.2.
- The
effect of the method statement in subsection 1076(3A) of the Act is that the
below threshold rate is applied on the first $50,200
for a single person. The
above threshold rate is applied to the balance of the person’s financial
assets. Mr Sidebottom’s
income exceeded the $50,200 threshold.
- Section
1083 of the Act provides that any return on a financial asset that a person
actually earns, derives or receives is taken for
the purposes of this Act not to
be ordinary income of the person. That is the actual income earned from the
deposits Mr Sidebottom
held in his bank accounts are not relevant to this
calculation of his income, rather the deeming provisions take effect. That is
the legislative outcome.
- Section
44 of the Act provides that an age pension is not payable to a person if a
person’s age pension rate would be nil. Section
80 of the Administration
Act provides that if a social security payment is being, or has been, paid to a
person who was not qualified
for the payment or it was not payable, the
Secretary is to determine that the payment is to be cancelled or suspended.
- Section
118 of the Administration Act provides that an adverse determination in Mr
Sidebottom’s circumstances takes effect on
the day on which the event or
circumstance occurred, that is 6 April 2018. Subsections 23(2) and (4) of the
Act provide that a person
is taken to be receiving a payment under this Act from
the earliest day until the latest day on which the payment is payable to the
person.
The cancellation decision
- The
effect of those provisions is that the decision to cancel Mr Sidebottom’s
age pension takes effect from the date of change
of circumstances, which
occurred on the settlement of the sale of his home on 6 April 2018. He was
taken to be receiving the age
pension until 6 April 2018. Although the
cancellation decision was made on 7 May 2018, it took effect as of the date of
the change
of circumstances.
- Section
1213 applies to portability of social security payment. It provides for
portability if immediately before the period of absence
commenced, in this case
7 May 2018, the person was receiving specified social security payments by
virtue of section 1217 of the
Act, which includes age pension. However, in this
case it cannot be said that Mr Sidebottom was receiving age pension immediately
before this period of absence, he was not entitled to the pension as of 6 April
2018. The cancellation decision had effect from
that date.
- The
definitions of financial asset, financial investment and deposit money mean that
the proceeds of sale of Mr Sidebottom’s
home held in his bank accounts
must be assessed under section 1076. Referring to the legislative provisions
above, that means that
the deposits held in Mr Sidebottom’s accounts are
subject to the deeming rates and not to the actual income that Mr Sidebottom
earned on those deposits. Therefore, Mr Sidebottom’s total income
including deemed income on 6 April 2018 was in excess of
the allowable limit for
age pension. Therefore his age pension was reduced to nil and was no longer
payable, according to section
44 of the Act.
- On
7 May 2018, the Department issued a letter advising Mr Sidebottom that his age
pension had been cancelled with effect from 6 April
2018. That decision was
correct for the reasons given. There is no difference in treatment whether Mr
Sidebottom’s age pension
had been cancelled or suspended; both would take
effect from 6 April 2018. Therefore Mr Sidebottom was not receiving age pension
immediately before this period of absence commenced on 7 May 2018. The Tribunal
notes that 7.2.2.60 of the Guide relates to post
departure reviews and is not
relevant in this case.
The 7 May 2018 claim for age pension
- When
Mr Sidebottom made a new claim for age pension on 7 May 2018 his financial
circumstances were the same as when the cancellation
decision was made and took
effect. His total assessable income exceeded the allowable limit. The decision
to reject his new claim
for age pension which was made on 25 June 2018 was
correct.
- Mr
Sidebottom said that he made the new claim because the international staff of
Centrelink informed him that he could not apply in
the UK because there was no
social security agreement with Australia and he had nothing to lose by lodging a
new claim. What he
described as the “delay” in making the decision
made no difference to the outcome because it depended on what his financial
circumstances were on the day of application and they had not changed since 6
April 2018.
Decision
- For
those reasons the reviewable decision must be affirmed. The Tribunal has no
discretion.
- The
reviewable decision is
affirmed.
I certify that the preceding 23 (twenty-three) paragraphs are a true
copy of the reasons for the decision herein of Mrs J C Kelly,
Senior
Member
|
...................................[SGD].....................................
Associate
Dated: 18 October 2019
Date(s) of hearing:
|
3 October 2019
|
|
In person
|
Solicitors for the Respondent:
|
Mr L Dennis, Department of Human Services
|
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/AATA/2019/4254.html