AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal

You are here: 
AustLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal >> 2022 >> [2022] NSWCCA 86

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Context | No Context | Help

Singh v R [2022] NSWCCA 86 (30 March 2022)

Last Updated: 22 April 2022



Court of Criminal Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales

Case Name:
Singh v R
Medium Neutral Citation:
Hearing Date(s):
30 March 2022
Date of Orders:
30 March 2022
Decision Date:
30 March 2022
Before:
Macfarlan JA at [1]
Bellew J at [3]
Wright J at [8]
Decision:
(1) The grant of conditional bail by Garling J on 2 December 2021 is revoked.

(2) A warrant is to be issued pursuant to s 39 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) remanding the respondent to a Correctional Centre under the control of Corrective Services NSW.
Catchwords:
BAIL – Where respondent was convicted in the Local Court and sentenced to a term of full time imprisonment – Where an appeal to the District Court was dismissed – Where the respondent then commenced proceedings seeking judicial review of the decision of the District Court – Where the respondent was granted conditional bail – Where respondent’s visa had been cancelled resulting in his being taken into the custody of the Australian Border Force on his release – Agreed between the parties that there had been a relevant change in circumstances which had a material and potentially adverse effect on the applicant’s prospects of success in the judicial review proceedings – Where Crown made an application for the respondent’s detention – Agreed between the parties that the application should succeed and that the respondent should be returned to the custody of Corrective Services NSW – Orders made – No point of principle
Legislation Cited:
Cases Cited:
Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCCA 337
Category:
Principal judgment
Parties:
Vikramjit Singh – Applicant
Regina – Respondent
Representation:
Counsel:
J Michie – Applicant
G Newtown – Respondent

Solicitors:
MIC Lawyers– Applicant
C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions – Respondent
File Number(s):
2022/00082995
Publication Restriction:
Nil
Decision under appeal:

Court or Tribunal:
District Court of NSW
Jurisdiction:
Criminal

JUDGMENT – EX-TEMPORE (REVISED)

1 MACFARLAN JA: I agree with Bellew J.

2 BELLEW J: On 28 April 2021, the respondent pleaded guilty in the Local Court to a number of charges. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 10 months, with a non-parole period of two years imprisonment, to date from 4 August 2021.

3 The respondent subsequently lodged an appeal to the District Court on the basis that the sentence imposed was too severe, and sought that any sentence of imprisonment be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order. On 23 August 2021, Judge Hanley SC dismissed that appeal, but varied the aggregate sentence to one of full-time imprisonment of 2 years, with a non-parole period of 15 months.

4 The respondent then commenced proceedings seeking judicial review of the decision of Judge Hanley SC (the judicial review proceedings) and on 1 November 2021 he filed an application in the Supreme Court for his release. On 8 November 2021 the judicial review proceedings were listed for hearing on 23 February 2022, although that date was later vacated.

5 On 2 December 2021 Garling J made orders releasing the respondent. However, in circumstances where the respondent’s visa allowing him to enter Australia had been cancelled, he was taken directly into the custody of the Australian Border Force upon his release.

6 On 21 December 2021, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCCA 337 (Stanley). It is agreed between the parties that this judgment has a material (and potentially adverse) effect on the respondent’s prospects of success in the judicial review proceedings. In those circumstances, the Crown filed an application seeking the respondent’s detention. The respondent concedes that the decision of the Court of Appeal in Stanley constitutes a relevant change in circumstances and raises no objection to the making of an order for his detention. Such order is appropriate in the circumstances.

ORDERS

7 In all of those circumstances I propose the following orders:

(1) The grant of conditional bail by Garling J on 2 December 2021 is revoked.

(2) A warrant is to be issued pursuant to s 39 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) remanding the respondent to a Correctional Centre under the control of Corrective Services NSW.

8 WRIGHT J: I also agree with Bellew J’s proposed orders, for the reasons his Honour has given.

9 MACFARLAN J: The orders of the Court will be those proposed by Bellew J.

**********


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2022/86.html