AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

You are here: 
AustLII >> Databases >> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales >> 2016 >> [2016] NSWLEC 1446

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Context | No Context | Help

Atelier One Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2016] NSWLEC 1446 (6 September 2016)

New South Wales Land and Environment Court

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]

Atelier One Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2016] NSWLEC 1446 (6 September 2016)

Last Updated: 28 September 2016



Land and Environment Court
New South Wales

Case Name:
Atelier One Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council
Medium Neutral Citation:
Hearing Date(s):
Conciliation conference on 6 September 2016
Date of Orders:
6 September 2016
Decision Date:
6 September 2016
Jurisdiction:
Class 1
Before:
Hussey AC
Decision:
See (4) below
Catchwords:
MODIFICATION APPLICATION: Additional external stairs to private open space area in residential flat building, amenity, visual/acoustic privacy, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:
Category:
Principal judgment
Parties:
Atelier One Pty Ltd Applicant)
Ryde City Council (Respondent)
Representation:
Solicitors:
Mr G Christmas, Apex Planning & Environment Law (Applicant)
Mr B Stephen, City of Ryde Council (Respondent)
File Number(s):
2016/169103
Publication Restriction:
No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

................

Acting Commissioner Hussey

169103.16 Hussey (C) - Annexure A (2.55 MB, pdf)

169103.16 Hussey (C) - Annexure B (1.06 MB, pdf)


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2016/1446.html