AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

You are here: 
AustLII >> Databases >> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales >> 2017 >> [2017] NSWLEC 1061

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Context | No Context | Help

Francesco Vartuli v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 1061 (14 February 2017)

New South Wales Land and Environment Court

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]

Francesco Vartuli v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 1061 (14 February 2017)

Last Updated: 14 February 2017



Land and Environment Court
New South Wales

Case Name:
Francesco Vartuli v Roads and Maritime Services
Medium Neutral Citation:
Hearing Date(s):
Conciliation conference on 9 February 2016
Date of Orders:
14 February 2017
Decision Date:
14 February 2017
Jurisdiction:
Class 3
Before:
Maston AC
Decision:
See (4) below
Catchwords:
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:
Category:
Principal judgment
Parties:
Francesco Vartuli (Frist Applicant)
Margerita Vartuli (Second Applicant)
Anna Vartuil (Third Applicant)
Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent)
Representation:
Solicitor:
Mr D Sachs, Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms Kalarostaghi, Hunt & Hunt (Respondent)
File Number(s):
2016/295684
Publication Restriction:
No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

Notations:

Statutory interest pursuant to ss.49 and 50 of the Act is payable on the remainder of compensation.

............................

Acting Commissioner Maston


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2017/1061.html