AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

You are here: 
AustLII >> Databases >> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales >> 2018 >> [2018] NSWLEC 1504

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Context | No Context | Help

Aboud v Hunter's Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1504 (26 September 2018)

Last Updated: 26 September 2018



Land and Environment Court
New South Wales

Case Name:
Aboud v Hunter’s Hill Council
Medium Neutral Citation:
Hearing Date(s):
Conciliation conference on 25 September 2018
Date of Orders:
26 September 2018
Decision Date:
26 September 2018
Jurisdiction:
Class 1
Before:
Smithson C
Decision:
See [4] below
Catchwords:
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:
Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:
Principal judgment
Parties:
Emileen Aboud (Applicant)
Hunter’s Hill Council (Respondent)
Representation:
Solicitors:
A Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Applicant)
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):
2018/92729
Publication Restriction:
No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Drawing Number
Drawn By
Plan Dated
Site & Analysis Plan
Dwg. A 01 Rev. 05
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
Lower Ground Floor Plan
Dwg. A 02 Rev. 06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
Ground Floor Plan
Dwg. A 03 Rev. 05
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
First Floor Plan
Dwg. A 04 Rev. 06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
Roof Plan
Dwg. A 05 Rev. 06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
Dwg. A 08 Rev. 06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
West & South Elevation
Dwg. A 09 Rev.06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
East & North Elevations
Dwg. A 10 Rev. 06
Sergio Melo e Azevedo, Architect
Rev: 24/9/18
(2) The Applicant’s written request under clause 4.6 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 for contravention of the maximum height development standard imposed by clause 4.3 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012, is upheld;
(3) The Applicant’s written request under clause 4.6 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 for contravention of the landscaped area development standard imposed by clause 6.9 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012, is upheld;
(4) The appeal is upheld;
(5) Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 2017/1060 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house on the land at 18 Lyndhurst Crescent, Hunters Hill, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.

............................

Jenny Smithson

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (96.8 KB, pdf) s34 plans combined (2.59 MB, pdf)


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2018/1504.html